this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
20 points (100.0% liked)

U.S. News

2244 readers
3 users here now

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.


Guidelines for submissions:

For World News, see the News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bermuda 12 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I know right?

He then went on linkedin claiming it was all fake and that people were "attacking him for who he loved." I'm sure some people were attacking him for being gay but I think most were attacking him for having sex in the senate hearing room.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It is nothing to do with him being gay. And it has everything to do with him filming himself having sex in a place where he shouldn’t be having sex, and then leaking it online. 

I didn’t even know he was gay until you mentioned it just now. It absolutely does not matter who you were fucking. It’s that you were fucking, recorded it, and it leaked. Shame on you. 

[–] pbjamm 3 points 11 months ago

Generally speaking having sex in your workplace is a bad idea*. Filming it, even worse. Doubly worse if that workplace is unique and identifiable. Triply worse if that place has security that tracks people access.

*obviously not if you are in the business of sex.

[–] senseamidmadness 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That right there is the dumb part. He should've owned up to it.

"Yes, I had killer sex in the Senate hearing room and all you senators are jealous you didn't do it first."

[–] millie 2 points 11 months ago

For real, if he'd embraced getting caught and just owned it he might have traded up for a much more interesting career.

load more comments (1 replies)