wandermind

I know, I was making a joke

Because Queue<T> is typically read "queue of T"

"You're a Queue of T"? I don't get it

As a linguist, I'd just shrug.

Lainatakseni erästä aiemmin kirjoittamaani kommenttia:

They are arguing in bad faith and they know it. The peace-absolutism is in a long tradition of pro-Soviet propaganda, where the only obstacle to eternal world peace was countries (particularly those opposing the Soviet Union) having any military at all. (Soviet Union was of course allowed to have a strong military to "protect" itself from Western, particularly US, "aggression").

All of the calls for "peace" and "diplomacy" now are exactly the same: calls to stop actively resisting Russian aggression, and in the longer term to destroy your capability of being able to resist in the first place. And, if possible, to simply roll over to all Russian demands because you aren't being "diplomatic" otherwise.

War, in this propagandistic view, is only caused by the country being invaded defending itself; after all, if they simply allowed Russia to take over, there would be no war. In the best case, the situation would have been solved through "diplomacy", i.e. simply agreeing to all Russian demands. That way war would have been avoided, right?

And because no sensible person wants war, the leaders saying "no" to Russian demands (and who therefore must not want diplomacy, right?) must want war either because they're corrupt and want to profit off of the war, because they're "russophobic" "nazis" who "unreasonably" hate Russia, or because they're being used as pawns by someone else, most likely the US. Because no one wants war, and therefore should be willing to conduct diplomacy over any questions (i.e. roll over to Russian demands) if they were not being manipulated in some way. And that is why poor Russia is "forced" to invade countries because of the US and the West, because being US pawns they are not willing to be diplomatic (i.e. agree to all Russian demands).

Anyone in the West supporting the invaded country is therefore a "warmongerer" if they do not support "diplomacy" (= letting Russia have whatever they want). Because there would be no war if Russia could just do whatever they want with no resistance.

Yeah, the point of the joke is that crop rotation has been practiced for literally thousands of years. It was an agricultural invention which gave ancient cultures significantly higher crop yields, enabling a huge number of societal, cultural and scientific developments. The joke is based on the idea that before crop rotation was discovered, some people might have considered it a silly idea, delaying the developments enabled by the significantly increased crop yields.

Yeah, to paraphrase something I once read on the other site, "unknown" doesn't mean "I don't know".

I'm half convinced Putin wants NATO to get directly involved so that he can pull out of Ukraine and be like "We didn't lose to Ukraine, it was the West who once again oppresses poor little Russia"

That's literally not how it works, anything else is Russian fearmongering.

Also a bunch of countries fucking up a single country who can't even conquer their neighbor does not a world war make. If it did, the Gulf War would be called WW3 already.

I don't see what that has to do with anything

It's one thing to have a general plan for a hypothetical scenario. It's entirely different to train your troops for a very specific scenario in a literal replica of the target location.

How many US troops do you think have received anti-zombie warfare training?

cops have learned to just play copyrighted music (say the Frozen soundtrack)

I hope they've secured the proper licenses for a public performance of that music.

Fingerpori is the name of Jarla's cartoon but the character is called Heimo Vesa.