underisk

joined 1 year ago
[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago

So people on the internet can get mad that you didn’t vote how they wanted instead of getting mad at you for not voting.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I see a lot of people build her exalted for fire rate but I think the alt fire build is way more fun and strong.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

Through various stages of my life I have used torrents, streaming, Usenet, Napster, limewire, aol/IRC chat rooms, discord, and even google searches. You must adapt to whatever works.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Then run it in a container under a better distribution if you desperately need to put neofetch on your HTPC. Or run the other distro in a container under libreelec since I’m pretty sure it supports them.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

It tracks anonymous statistics, without my express consent, for the benefit of a third party. I do not care if it exists to replace cookies, because I’m not even convinced that cookies need to exist at all anymore. What utility do they provide to the actual person using the browser that can’t be accomplished through some other more modern API? If the only functionality left to replace is tracking people then maybe just deprecate them and move on.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Telegram had credibility. It was being used by journalists to protect sources.

You can extend trust to individuals but do not apply that to companies or organizations if you care at all about what they’re doing with what you give them. Not everyone has some mythical tech privacy wizard on call to give them perfect advice every time they open an account on an app or website.

Even client side encryption is not infallible. The algorithm you use will eventually be crackable and probably sooner than you think. Nothing lasts forever.

The most foolproof way to ensure something remains private is to not put it on the internet at all.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

If you can read and understand the code, sure. Otherwise you’re still just extending trust to someone perhaps less reputable than even the corporations who are dying to sell you out. For example, the back door some mysterious contributor slipped into xz recently.

My recommendation is to live life as if privacy on the internet did not exist, because it doesn’t.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Never trust a third party to keep your shit private. Especially if privacy is their main selling point.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Human Shield is a fun little linguistic trick that turns innocent human beings with lives and internality similar to your own into prop objects wielded by an inhuman enemy. This makes it way easier to justify mowing them down in service of your geopolitical goals. Every time that phrase is used it is a sign that someone is probably trying to justify something inhumane; usually something that would be considered a war crime if done against the ones using it.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

Yet even if the snack-dye technique remains relegated to lab mice, it offers a better window into one of the most commonly used model organisms than we’ve ever had before.

The writer was definitely smirking to himself when he wrote this line.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Wow the head of AI for MS doesn’t know what the word freeware means.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago

If you disable it you can prevent Microsoft from force updating your windows 10 install to windows 11. Obviously a play to get people to buy new hardware for 11 but a useful anti feature I suppose until you can stomach switching to Linux.

view more: next ›