midgephoto

joined 2 years ago
[–] midgephoto@photog.social 2 points 1 year ago

@merridew
...There are many things we could do, many of which are good or at least not bad, and deciding how much of each we do is a strange business.

I think resource allocation and deployment could be done better, but I don't have ambitions as planetary overlord or whatever.

A while after I was born there were 4 billion of us*, and soon there will be 9 billion. Some things we should be able to do much more of and better, some we do, and some things we may need to share more widely.

* ish

[–] midgephoto@photog.social 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

@merridew Interesting paper. On COVID I didn't see the 4 billion in there, but I didn't do adding up, either.
I've ignored all the vaccines that are not mRNA for assorted reasons, but they must be potentially useful still.

On Influenza, I think the capacity is greatly more than that, but much of it is potential and/or used for other purposes. Given a 1919-like strain we could ramp it up rapidly.

[–] midgephoto@photog.social 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

@merridew You might find it helpful to see this as lining up the whole population, of the world, in ranks, ordered by how useful or urgent it is to immunise them.

You have enough doses for fewer ranks than are there. You have more doses of flu vaccine than of COVID.

In what order have you put your ranks?

Are the ranks identical for the 2 (and several other) vaccines?

You may care to imagine being in rank n+1
Why should you be swapped with someone in rank n?

[–] midgephoto@photog.social 2 points 1 year ago

@fakeman_pretendname @merridew
None of them are £0
We buy them in bulk, and pay for most through general taxation, efficiently.

The COVID vaccines are made by actually more expensive and difficult techniques/ologies, which are available in new facilities of more limited extent.

Expect the products of those techs to become more plentiful and cheaper, and the difference may get below the order of magnitude. Not to parity.

[–] midgephoto@photog.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@Syldon @tintory
Individual experience trumps news media, don't you think?

[–] midgephoto@photog.social 1 points 1 year ago

@RobotToaster @Syldon
Do they not though?
My impression was that runways have been blocked.

[–] midgephoto@photog.social 2 points 1 year ago

@Patch @Hogger85 It is going to be a standard need at holiday and break places.

[–] midgephoto@photog.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

@david I might be missing something, but I have no idea what website you are complaining about.
I initially assumed you had trouble with a Mastodon server.
Good that you have worked round it.
Oh, Drax. Very Bond.

[–] midgephoto@photog.social 1 points 1 year ago

@Hossenfeffer And finally, Londoners who now need a <15 year old petrol car, to replace their 16 year old one, can have I gather £2000 toward it as scrappage, funded by the people who get cleaner air out of it, their wider neighbours.

Occasional visitors are asked not to be mucky, but if they insist, can pay.
Frequent visitors - well yes, action indicated.

[–] midgephoto@photog.social 1 points 1 year ago

@Hossenfeffer Barcelona has one. We drove a far from new SLK into there. (We don't live in London, either)
It required registration with an automatic system, in English, and a e5 fee.
Nuisance, but it is now recognised as compliant not just in Barcelona, but throughout Spain.

That's an area of nuisance in England, that this is multiplying effort, and an incompetent and uncaring central gov isn't coordinating it.

[–] midgephoto@photog.social 1 points 1 year ago

@Hossenfeffer vehicle purchase decisions involved would be an earlier buying of a less old car, or not a LandRover Defender, Aston Martin DB5, old Diesel etc.
Petrol newer than 16 years old, diesel newer than 5y, generally.
Not, generally, of ordering a new VW ID.3 (I drove into the dealer, said "I'd like that one" drove it home, but if I'd made a specification it would have taken much of a year to arrive.

But if I had, I'd have an order form, and IIUC, would have been exempt from ULEZ charge!

[–] midgephoto@photog.social 2 points 1 year ago

@Hossenfeffer It'll affect around 10 000 000 people, I think.
The effect is better air to breath and less illness caused.
If you were to tell them you were going to improve their air, but you'd decided to give them 5 years notice rather than one year, I think stepping back quickly out of reach would bd wise.

The effects are of course incremental.

Is this a new thing?

The MOT was introduced last century, I forget when it changed from "not a smokescreen" to limited exhsust emissions. But, no.

view more: ‹ prev next ›