Who exactly are you talking about when you say Brazil? There's a lot of people here that really don't care at all, but there's also people working to preserve the forest for a variety of reasons at different levels.
elfpie
joined 1 year ago
The airlines keep saying that they will make sure the staff follow the policies instead of providing training to avoid negative bias. The policy they talk about is one that changed because of racial bias (asking for medical license). The doctor of the article only had their license at hand because they had recently talked to the doctor who was previously profiled and motivated the change in policy.
No, that's just racist. That's something to remember when you argue with someone like that.
The problem that I see is that power comes in great part from the responsibility to educate yourself. In a community, you don't have to know everything to contribute to its workings, but someone has, enough people do you escape the clutches of external players. Everything is quite individualist right now though. Things must just work without the help of anyone.
“That immediately causes them to tune out because … that puts their guard up,” she said. “If you were to go to anybody and say, ‘I am telling you this because you are potentially a violent person,’ and that person feels that fundamentally they’re not, that’s going to cause that person to get defensive and tune out. That is something that we’ve seen across all of the research that we’ve done, that the young men on college campuses find that [prevention education] is either completely ‘name, blame, shame’ or is irrelevant to them as men within their campus community.”
The culture of victim blaming creates an enemy instead of focusing on the real issues. And the biggest issue is that we can't recognize abuse as easily as we believe we naturally do. It's normal, it's okay, but it isn't.
They probably are. That said, it's always a good idea to ask the question: "why would people use the worse alternative?"
They can block access to the site if they don't comply. Then people use VPN.
The rest of the population should also pay attention, and it's the kind of support that shields the protest from being easily dismissed.
I don't think it's the same concern. It's not that people will become pedophiles or act on it more because of the normalization and exposure. It's people will see less of a problem with the sexualization of children. The parallel being the amount of violence we are OK being depicted. The difference being we can only emulate in a personal level the sexual side.
Maybe there's the argument that violence is escapist, sexual desire is ever present and porn is addictive.
That's really curious. LLM were usually on the other side of this note and not considered the traditional AI people referred to.
Adapting is a survival mechanism most times. You do it because you have no choice. Conforming would be accepting the status quo, that you'll always have to adapt because it can't be changed.
Personally, I believe we should aspire to shrink standards and embrace more variety. It's more work for a lot of people, but it would benefit everyone in the long run.
Adapt if it doesn't hurt you. Create space for the other if the only argument against is it's going to be inconvenient.
Loved the second hypothesis. I feel a lot of potential there.