altz3r0

joined 1 year ago
[–] altz3r0 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not really in the sense of a fusion, as my understanding is that those two genres are pretty much opposite extremes, with solarpunk being more optimistic, while cyberpunk is, well, dystopian by nature. I do need to get more into solarpunk, but THE BACKLOG, you know.

Edit: @alyaza@beehaw.org just gave you a serious list, so there's that!

[–] altz3r0 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@SeverianWolf@beehaw.org > Haunted

I came here to post this!

I am not much of a horror/disturbing stories fan, but Guts was simply astonishing, I read this more than 10 years ago and still remember the story vividly.

[–] altz3r0 7 points 1 year ago

Oh, don't for a second think we have really gone too far from burning on crosses!

[–] altz3r0 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not as actively, unfortunately, but I have seen some writing prompts in !writing@beehaw.org

[–] altz3r0 7 points 1 year ago

You are right in assuming there will be a symbyosis between AI generated text and human generated text, but jumping from there to assume that we will be using solely AI generated text is wrong, in my opinion.

AI generated content is not good enough on its own, despite what OpenAI marketing team wants you to think. No quality content is made by simply prompting chatGPT. Not just in writing, but in any field of knowledge, actually. Using chatGPT without some level of domain and fact checking on the subject you are prompting is a sure way to get screwed, as some lawyer in the USA will tell you.

But going back to writing specifically, what we will see at first is actually an improvement on the overall quality of human generated writing, with AI offering a solution to the mechanical and usually boring side of writing good content, such as eloquence, syntax, clarity, etc.

Then, what we will also begin to notice is the more frequent use of what I like to call shitstorming.

Shitstorming consisting in prompting a LLM model to bring up ideas, drafts and opinions on subjects you want to write about, and have some understanding on. What you will receive in response will be a biased, somewhat lacking content, which will either inspire you to modify and refactor in a way that it makes sense, or make you so angry that you will have to write something better in response to it. Writer's block will become a thing of the past.

There are others aspects and nuances to this symbiosis, but to avoid going longer on an already long post, I would conclude by saying that this evolution will be a loop that will keep improving LLMs, while also improving human writing simply because we will continuously look for ways to make the content better, and more original.

The bad side is that, for those that don't know how to use the tool, the amount of lacking content and standardized communication will indeed flood the internet, but this will only serve to contrast original content to the point where we will immediatly recognize the two apart, much like we do with advertising nowdays.

[–] altz3r0 1 points 1 year ago

Nice, thanks very much for sharing it!

[–] altz3r0 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

I'm very divided with 1984. It's context is so massively anti-communist, yet it ironically portrayed much of the authoritarianism we see today in capitalist countries. So much so that when I first read it in my teens, it didn't cross my mind that he was taking shots at old Russia! I find it to be one of those few things that are better when you interpret it wrong.

[–] altz3r0 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh yeah, I totally forgot the Usenet, before my generation, sorry!

Innovation is a spiral, ain't it?

[–] altz3r0 73 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Used to be a fan of Louis back on my days of computer repair shop. Nice to see he is still going strong!

But yeah, the writing on the wall is clear, and it's not just Reddit. Imho, this situation emphasizes the importance of smaller, connected communities rather than massive social media platforms. We came to love massive social networks, but didn't realize the consequences of getting lost in the crowd and becoming mere data points for profit. Small, connected communities offer a more personal and respectful alternative.

What we have here with the Fediverse is a gold mine. Picture 00's phpbb forums, but all with access to each other. That just sound like a good time to me. It's rough around the edges, sure, but it's our own corner of web.

[–] altz3r0 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, my hopes are high, I already am quite fond of this new home. :)

[–] altz3r0 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I think preservation is happening, the issue lies in accessibility. Projects like Archive.org are the public ones, but it is certain that private organizations are doing the same, just not making it public.

This is also something that is my biggest worry about the Fediverse. It has tools to deal with it, but they are self-contained. No search engine is crawling the Fediverse as far as I've looked, and no initiative to archive, index and overall make the content of the Fediverse accessible is currently in place, and that's a big risk. I'm sure we will soon be seeing loss of information for this reason, if not already happened.

[–] altz3r0 4 points 1 year ago

Theres more to it than that, vut it does help. However, the base issue here I think is that they just don't crawl the federated space yet.

view more: ‹ prev next ›