RuikkaaPrus

joined 10 months ago
[–] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago

This proposal is meaningless bullshit. I can't believe we are one of the the oldest species on earth and they keep coming up with such ridiculous ideas. This is a NO from me for this ridiculous proposal.

[–] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 22 points 4 months ago (9 children)

JavaScript is crazy. While you are learning React.js or Vue.js you are learning Webpack, Rollup or Vite.js even without your consent :skull:

[–] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Apparently it is impossible for this kind of functions to be defined as friends of classes:

template 
auto do_something(T &t) -> decltype(t.private_msg);

class Foo
{
private:
    const char *private_msg = "You can't touch me!";
    
friend auto do_something<>(Foo &f) -> decltype(f.private_msg); // Error!
};

template <>
auto do_something(Foo &f) -> decltype(f.private_msg) // Error!
{
    return f.private_msg; // Error!
}

After trying different combinations, it seems that I managed to get it working with the condition the whole template are considered friends of the class. I don't know if I should consider it a language problem, but it seems that way, since the template restrictions (in this case) are minor.

template 
auto do_something(T &t) -> decltype(t.private_msg);

class Foo
{
private:
    const char *private_msg = "You can't touch me!";

template 
friend auto do_something(T &t) -> decltype(t.private_msg); // This works fine!
};

template <>
auto do_something(Foo &f) -> decltype(f.private_msg)
{
    return f.private_msg;
}

Do you think I found an error in the language?

 

Yes, it is probably a weird question, but I tried a lot, and I started to think that maybe is impossible to overload this template function properly:

#include <iterator>

class Foo
{
private:
    const int arr[5] = {10, 20, 30, 40, 50};
public:
    const int* begin() const { return arr; }

friend auto std::begin<>(const Foo &f) -> decltype(f.begin());
}

It always throw the same error (in GCC 12.2.0):

main.cxx:10:13: error: template-id ‘begin<>’ for ‘const int* std::begin<>(const Foo&)’ does not match any template declaration

I just wanna know if is possible do things like this. Thanks.

[–] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Disroot also gives all +Xmpp +Fediverse

Well then, why no choose Disroot instead?

[–] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

I really do not know. But what I can say for sure is that during the installation of Debian, it allows you to choose the desktop environment at installation time, so you can have your Debian with KDE at minute 0 after installing it.

On the other hand, remember that Kubuntu is derived from Ubuntu. I don't see Ubuntu fans very enthusiastic about creating another Debian-based distro with KDE preinstalled when they even offer it (live images) to you here.

[–] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You probably will not notice that you are in other distro when you start using Debian. They are the same in most things, but without Snaps and most propietary stuff (by default. But if you really need propietary things, you may see the official non-free sourcelist)

[–] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

This is the sad true. Nowdays, sdk haves tons of these analytics and telemetry. According to Dart documentation we can disable its analytics. And the first time the CLI is executed, this analysis is not used (respecting the opt-out concept). Is at your discretion trust Google's words (or investigate Dart's source code to find out if it is true or not, or if there are even other unethical means, although I find it a bit unlikely). If you wanna do the second, You can use something like CatFish to help you.

[–] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Well... Flatpak ships Propietary Software too. And at this point Propietary Software is almost avoidable (unless you have a LibreBoot. I want one too). But it's reasonable to be frustrated that an operating system as influential as Ubuntu has ended up falling so down in its technology, and that it has the support of a company like Chanonical.

Edit: Thank you for the comments. I didn't noticed Snap itself is propietary.

[–] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

In my experience. I didn't like Murena. I used it for a while (I think 6 months. I don't remember well). And yes, it's "ok", but the interface is a bit broken.

The good thing is that there is a lot of software you can use there: OnlyOffice, NextCloud (much of their software), Searx and even Gitlab are there.

Another thing: if you like SMPT and IMAP, the Murena account offers you this. I prefer Proton, but it a good option too.

[–] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

You're right. Maybe I should have put more information about it. The idea was perhaps to find out what information the Lemmy community could share. I would like to be as experienced as other community members, but I'm not very expert yet :(

[–] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I think C and C++ are safer options, because GNU doesn't use this technology in particular. But Dart are obviously using opt-out telemetry. You should disable it manually. Idk the case of Ruby, sorry :(

[–] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

The funny paradox lmao.

 

This post is not related other previously published posts. But I want to know your opinions.

This debate does not focus on "which technology is better" or "which has better support", rather it focuses on which of these two technologies seems more acceptable in terms of privacy policy and user information management (on his respective toolchain, compiler, etc).

 

There are no "news", but I'm worried about this business actually. I'm in knowledge that post already exists but I'm not clear at all.

Resuming: Google is trying to add telemetry to Go's toolchain (such as .NET and Dart/Flutter). It also added the GOPROXY environment variable that uses the Google's Go proxy to... Just collect more user data?

I'm a pretty beginner Go dev, but I'd like a toolchain without these telemetry or at least some instruction of how to opt out this thing.

Sorry for repost, but I don't find enough information in any other place. :(

 

Okay, it may sound like a personal issue, but I disagree with the privacy practices in developer tools. And I'm not talking about VSCode issue, but about other more elemental development tools. For example, the privacy policy of npmjs.com, pkg.go.dev (Google's privacy policy lol), hub.docker.com, and these public registries for developers, have some questionable privacy practices as well.

I wanna know your opinions about.

14
??? (lemmy.ml)
 
 
 
 
 

Yeah, I'm sure this is a pretty newbie question, but here I go:

What ammount of telemetry have Flutter by default? And there is a way to deactivate it? I wanna learn this technology to develop some Mobile Applications, but I'm (honestly) worried about this, because you know, Google dirty techniques, etc.

 
 
 

I already have heared about Bottles sandboxing capabilities, but, how this differs from standard Flatpak sandboxing system? Is really secure execute any Windows Software using Bottles? (yes, every machine have his vulnerabilities blah blah)

view more: next ›