Microsoft is terrible. Remember they also require you to use a Microsoft account for Minecraft now. Fuck this company so much
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
129 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
1083 readers
33 users here now
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
And they're also deleting/deleted all classic Minecraft accounts from before that. They invented an incredibly weird and needlessly obtuse process to extend the migration deadline by 3 months (true final deadline is now mid December 2023), but that's seemingly it. Everyone not paying too much attention to their email just gets $30 worth of game deleted because of a completely arbitrary decision.
Anyone without access to their old email also loses their account. I don't remember which email address I used with my account back in the day (it's at least ten years old), and since I bought my key from a reseller, I don't have a receipt. Microsofts response was basically "not our problem, guess you'll have to pay us again ¯\_(ツ)_/¯"
This is primarily to ensure we can support the load for developers on GitHub and help protect the servers from being overwhelmed by anonymous requests from bots etc.
So, Azure's bot protection is crap. Good to know.
People who haven't hosted anything bigger than a two digit daily visitors tells Microsoft how bad their bots protection is.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Google can accommodate billions of searches globally on pages it doesn't control
Microsoft can't index a tiny fraction of that number, even for it's own users.
What a black eye for Microsoft engineering.
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
This has been implemented since like 2016, this is not news lol.
Can someone tell me why this is unreasonable?
I think it kind of flies in the face of what Open Source Software should be. They're walling off code behind accounts in the Microsoft ecosystem.
I think it’s kind of a slippery slope; but I don’t think the search itself being login walled is apocalyptic. As long as anonymous users can clone the repositories and browse the code, I can kind of understand why they don’t want to pay to run an elastic search cluster for bots’ benefit. Presumably in-repo search could be done locally by scrapers’ hardware.
But if it turns into “login to view this repository” then GitHub will have turned evil.
They're not walling off any code. They're restricting use of their server-side search resources. Other repository hosting services don't have code search at all.
It’s more gating off than walling. If it keeps access and usage free I’m ok with it.
It is a betrayal to the developers who put our projects up there. We wanted everything to be freely accessible, and of course this is just another step in enshittification of the service. Remember that many of us have small projects with few viewers, and we know that the extra burden on the server side isn't even measurable. Yet our work is less accessible.
The code is still accessible, you just can't use the code search function in the web, which normal git doesn't have anyway.
Yes, precisely. They built a useful feature and are now trying to wall off the garden. Enshittification.
This has been around for a while. It may be so they can track and throttle LLMs hovering up public code repos.
Either way, it's a meh. Not sure why anyone would want to clutch their pearls over this. For those who need it, self-hosted gitlab is available.
I'm not sure LLMs will need to use the search facility when they could clone the repo.
I'm pretty sure this only applies to non-indexed repos right?
indexing is a very expensive process and usually takes 5-10 minutes for repos with 10k+ lines, and letting non-registered users start it is not the best idea in the first place