this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
129 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1083 readers
31 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Response from Martin Woodward, GitHub's VP of Developer Relations:

Sorry for the inconvenience @koepnick - while searching across all repos has required being logged in for a long time, when we enhanced the search capabilities earlier in the 2023 we had to extend this to repos as well (see https://github.blog/changelog/2023-06-07-code-search-now-requires-login/).

This is primarily to ensure we can support the load for developers on GitHub and help protect the servers from being overwhelmed by anonymous requests from bots etc.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Can someone tell me why this is unreasonable?

[–] btp@kbin.social 23 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I think it kind of flies in the face of what Open Source Software should be. They're walling off code behind accounts in the Microsoft ecosystem.

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 7 points 11 months ago

I think it’s kind of a slippery slope; but I don’t think the search itself being login walled is apocalyptic. As long as anonymous users can clone the repositories and browse the code, I can kind of understand why they don’t want to pay to run an elastic search cluster for bots’ benefit. Presumably in-repo search could be done locally by scrapers’ hardware.

But if it turns into “login to view this repository” then GitHub will have turned evil.

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 months ago

They're not walling off any code. They're restricting use of their server-side search resources. Other repository hosting services don't have code search at all.

[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

It’s more gating off than walling. If it keeps access and usage free I’m ok with it.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It is a betrayal to the developers who put our projects up there. We wanted everything to be freely accessible, and of course this is just another step in enshittification of the service. Remember that many of us have small projects with few viewers, and we know that the extra burden on the server side isn't even measurable. Yet our work is less accessible.

[–] andreluis034@lm.put.tf 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The code is still accessible, you just can't use the code search function in the web, which normal git doesn't have anyway.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Yes, precisely. They built a useful feature and are now trying to wall off the garden. Enshittification.