this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
36 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30549 readers
23 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SteposVenzny 10 points 1 year ago

I've got a 1080p monitor and a 4k TV in my house and have used my computer plugged into each. The TV is also better for a lot of non-resolution reasons so sometimes I'll want to move it there for those factors but in terms of displaying the 4k visuals, I honestly don't think it makes a difference for me at all. Rendering the image at 4k internally has all sorts of benefits for the graphics but displaying that internally 4k image on the 1080 monitor retains all those benefits so I don't see any point in buying a higher-definition monitor.

But the thing is, I never even wanted 4k on the TV at all. I didn't want it to be smart, either. I just wanted good-looking colors and it became impossible to find a TV that put the effort into what I cared about that didn't come with the other features. So I suspect that when I do ever replace my monitor, it's probably also going to strong-arm me into having a higher resolution that I don't actually want. And I can't help but assume this is a big portion of what's leading to these survey results.

[–] LuckyCharmsNSoyMilk 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Cries in 3070 with dual 1080p. One day…

[–] TheOakTree 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I run one 1440p and one 1080p on a 6750XT, most games run fine for me. Have you tried with the 3070?

[–] abir_vandergriff 2 points 1 year ago

Having two monitors should not noticeably impact performance. The difference is completely negligible, no matter the resolution of the attached secondary display. Rendering takes the bulk of the processing load, and a secondary screen doesn't itself render anything.

[–] LuckyCharmsNSoyMilk 1 points 1 year ago

I mostly mean one day I’ll be able to justify dropping $1k on an ultrawide and be done with it. I know I’m absolutely underutilizing my card.

[–] fryman@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have a 2070 super with dual 1440 monitors. Spider-Man remastered runs at 90fps, high settings, with ray tracing so I’m not sure what this article is getting at with how only the newest high end video cards match consoles.

I often use my second monitor but just from a practical perspective, it doesn’t need to be all that nice. You may consider just upgrading your main monitor. Though, like you mentioned, an ultra wide might be a good choice.

[–] LuckyCharmsNSoyMilk 1 points 1 year ago

I've thought about that but at that point I'd be getting a 27" monitor where my secondary/secondaries would be 24" and I don't think my OCD would allow that honestly. I know it's a small thing but I can already see it driving me up the wall.

[–] thingsiplay 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

(Edit: An image should be shown here, but it's missing...)

It's mainly because of the 720p resolution, that is common for handheld PCs. For Linux devices its even bigger change, for 800 x 1280 and 1280 x 800 together got almost 14% bump. Other resolutions for any platform didn't change drastically.

Windows: 1280 x 720 2.19% (+1.93%)

[–] IcedCoffeeBitch 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For me 144Hz is more important than resolution, and my RX 580 still works so 🤷🏽‍♀️

[–] tburkhol 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I went from 1080 to 1440 back when I got an rtx 1060, and the extra real estate is nice. I'm not ready to shell out for a video card that would consistently keep up with 4k. If you're not playing on the living room TV, I suspect the benefit - to gaming - of the higher resolution is minimal. 27-30" 2560x1440 monitor at arm's length makes pixels about 1 minute of arc, which is about the limit of normal visual acuity.

[–] averyminya 1 points 1 year ago
[–] minishoemaze 4 points 1 year ago

27" 1440p has been great for me. Rocking a 3080ti and it handles almost everything quite well at that size

[–] no_time_like_the@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

I've been on 2560x1440 for close to 8 years now. Could never go back. Either that or game on the 4k TV

[–] Jagget@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Hmmm… I’m going to buy a new monitor and it will be 2560x1080. Because prices are insane