In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
It’s difficult to overstate how disastrous a ruling in this case going the other way could have been, on top of the corrupting influence of large amounts of money already involved in politics and how gerrymandered districts already are.
I agree. The Republicans control enough state legislatures that saying "state legislatures can just declare who the winner is despite the vote tally" would mean a permanent Republican House and Senate majority (with the Senate majority filibuster proof) and a permanent Republican presidency.
Thankfully, any such ambitions to subvert democracy in this manner have been paused for now.
Note, paused and not stopped. I'm sure the Republicans will try to find another way to present this to get the Supreme Court to approve of it. This is a win in a battle, but the war is far from over.
Shocking news. I fully expected them to sign democracy's death warrant.
This session has really been sort of surprising when compared with last session. The 6-3 Republican majority last year really kicked the hornet's nest, between the NY gun case and Dobbs. It seemed like now that the Court was firmly in the hands of ideologues they were just going to go YOLO and tick off every item on the right-wing wish list.
I have no way of substantiating this, but I have to wonder if the outrage that has arisen nationwide in the wake of Dobbs, along with all of the coverage of the various justices' ethical lapses, is having a similar effect as FDR's court-packing scheme had on the Court of the 1930s. His plan to add sympathetic justices to the Court to stop the string of right-wing blows against the New Deal failed, but it was a credible enough threat that it caused at least one justice to stop obstructing and allowed FDR's programs to get through unimpeded.
Could it be that the majority is so uncomfortable with the heat it's gotten the past year that they're throwing cold water on their grander ambitions? If so, let's keep up the pressure!
I don't know about "the majority", but I'm pretty sure Roberts has been twisting arms so that his legacy isn't being the chief justice who presided over the downfall of the court.
Entirely possible, though it seems like he was twisting arms the last session to get his colleagues to slow down, and we all saw how that turned out. Something has shifted, and I'm not really sure what, but while the Court as a whole is decidedly right-wing, it's more chastened than the triumphalist 2021-22 session.
I have a suspicion that the court would have left Roe at least partially intact if the draft memo hadn't leaked.
I highly doubt that.
Consider that the NC supreme court had overturned the original ruling that was being appealed, making this case moot. They could have simply passed on this case and we'd be at exactly the same place.
For doing absolutely nothing and clearing the lowest possible bar, they are getting credit for "moderating". News agency proclaiming this a "win for a democracy" and showing the "even handedness" of the court... That they took up the case at all is why we're here!!
I was wondering the same thing, I fully expected them to rule against democracy. We definitely need to keep up the pressure and support investigative journalists like Propublica who is applying said pressure.
Of course the 3 opposed were the ones that were bought off by billionaires the most.
Thank fuck
As someone who lives in Texas this gives me hope that the state’s voter suppression tactics will be overturned.
Unfortunately, the Supreme Court is still of the opinion that they cannot hear cases alleging partisan gerrymandering. This decision only means that the highest court of a state may be able to decide in matters of partisan gerrymandering within their state. With the Texas Supreme Court consisting of nine Republicans, I'm doubtful that many acts of the state legislature will be overturned even in cases of overtly partisan actions.
That and the other two previous decisions overturning bad districting already
Thank fucking god. That's all I can say.
who were the 3 in the 6 v 3?
Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas. Gorsuch has occasionally surprised me. Alito and Thomas can always be counted on to be horrible.
Gorsuch sucks and should never have been appointed, but he is an odd bird compared to the rest of the ghouls. There’s something about the weird Rocky Mountain libertarianism he pulls out that makes the ghoulish majority a bit more interesting
Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch.
This is excellent news. Moore V. Harper would have been disastrous for U.S. democracy. Moreso than Citizens United, or the current state of gerrymandering.
Paywalled. But is this the state legislature theory thing?
Yes. As mentioned upthread, a loss in this case would probably have spelled the end of democratic elections in this country for a generation or more.
Good god, thank god it didn't pass.
Sounds way too good.