this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
11 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22056 readers
10 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"It is undeniable that the intrinsics of Julian’s case are so shocking it is something one would expect from the worst dictatorships," Stella Assange says.

"A thin patina of ‘process’ cannot obscure the fact that he is facing 175 years for groundbreaking journalism, that the only agencies who will decide on the conditions and degree of isolation that he will be held in if he is sent to a US prison, pre- and post-trial, are the same agencies that were elaborating plans to kill him while he had political asylum at the embassy, that is to say, the CIA,“ she added.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The promise of WikiLeaks was exposure of wrongdoing, anywhere. Assange ran it as his personal score-settling service to help Russia.

Small man wants to run his own personal foreign policy he can rot in prison for all I care.

[–] 0x815@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@deegeese

The promise of WikiLeaks was exposure of wrongdoing, anywhere. Assange ran it as his personal score-settling service to help Russia.

The US war crimes in Iraq back then didn't help Russia as much as the Russian war crimes in Ukraine now don't help the US. Both are crimes against humanity. It is impossible that they 'help' anyone.

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're referring to all the shenanigans before the 2016 election when they decided to release a bunch of hacked info on Dems while holding back anything critical of Republicams.

[–] donuts@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Also while coordinating and conspiring with the Trump campaign on Twitter DMs.

In fact, "shenanigans" is far too soft a word for what they did.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The indictment is sealed as far as I know. But I think the question is did Assange help Chelsea Manning break into a US Government server to steal documents. If the jury says yes, he is then guilty of computer crimes and stealing US property. Yes, he would then go to jail. Too bad.

[–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We’ve all (anyone with a soul, at least) accepted that Manning was right in leaking. Why are people so hellbent on prosecuting another person for the same moral act? Because he sucks? Come on.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Manning went to jail. She broke the law that's a fact. It is also a fact that there is an indictment waiting for Assange. Are we a nation of laws or just feelings on what's right?

[–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Oh so you're a reductionist

[–] pre@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

She's mostly right, other than that there never was any moral high-ground outside the propaganda of the western press. We have always been hypocritical on human rights and justifications for invasions.