this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
124 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10177 readers
21 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The ad in question is here.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] circularfish 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But anti-vax misinformation , which literally kills people, is perfectly fine.

This guy likes to portray himself as a rationalist and a free thinker, but he is nothing more than a scared man-child willing to pander to the dregs of society just for $8 and a dose of validation.

The sooner this festering boil of a social media site implodes, the better.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] reddwarf@feddit.nl 20 points 1 year ago

Musk has been mad all along. People just start to realize it.

[–] Rentlar 21 points 1 year ago

The ad, while not suitable for work, is hilarious!

Very creative on the Progressive Action Fund, it starts like a safe sex ad.

[–] LegendofDragoon@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This law is obviously just an attempt to get a case that can strike down Griswold at the corrupt, illegitimate supreme court. They know it will get challenged, it's exactly what they want.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As a foreigner, this thing with the US where there are no laws for pretty basic stuff like abortion and contraceptives, just random USSC cases somehow divining these judgements from entirely unrelated stuff, how many layers does this go down? Do you guys have actual laws? Is murder actually illegal by law signed by elected officials, or is it just a random precedent that a bunch of unelected loons getting in the USSC for life can unravel?

Serious question, did the US actually outlaw segregation, or is it coming up next?

[–] LegendofDragoon@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

To your last point, Brown Vs. The Board of Education prevents racial segregation in schools, Loving vs. Virginia prevents state laws against interracial marriages, and Atlanta Hotel Vs. The US was the landmark finding that upheld the legitimacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, specifically the clause that prevents businesses from discriminating based on protected classes.

So to answer your question at large, we DO have actual laws on the books that are supposed to protect historically targeted minorities, but at any moment these rogue malefactors could declare any one of those laws unconstitutional as they've shown they have NO regard for precedent.

[–] PostmodernPythia 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Basic rights for people who aren’t white dudes were mostly imposed by court order. That’s the reality. We have laws, it’s just that those laws were written at a time when personhood didn’t really apply to anyone who wasn’t a white man. And if no one who you consider a full person is capable of being pregnant, you’re not going to think to put in a right to abortion explicitly, even if it’s a basic requirement for equal citizenship for the female sex, because women (and trans people) aren’t really people…and so on.

Edit: I realize this is mostly due to the weird semi-religious fervor Americans have for our Constitution and government system.

TL; DR: We’re running Modern Democracy 1.0 with a Frankenstein covering of patches, while other countries just upgrade whenever they need you.

[–] Sharpiemarker@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

Somehow photos and videos of child abuse get left up for days but a political ad about consenting adults gets taken down immediately.

Shocking...

[–] Girlparts@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago