this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
100 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37734 readers
40 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] squiblet@kbin.social 69 points 1 year ago (1 children)

X also warned advertisers that beginning Aug. 7, brands’ accounts will lose their verification—a gold check mark that indicates their account truly represents their brand—if they haven’t spent at least $1,000 on ads in the previous 30 days or $6,000 on ads in the previous 180 days, according to the email.

Wow, he just can't stop making verification more useless. I'd expect that most brands would respond to this by not using Twitter (oops, 'X') any longer.

[–] HappyMeatbag 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So now he’s a thug. Basically, Elon is telling companies to pay him protection money, otherwise something might “happen” to their brand.

I hope a big client tells him, publicly, that he can fuck off.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

At the very least, one could view it as charging a very high membership fee for brands.... $1,000 a month.

[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

New platform? Who dis?
Seriously, it's just a user database now. The brand is gone. It's a new company. New URL. New direction.
Asking 50% of Twitter's rates is way too high. Go back to square one, hoss. Start over. From the ground.
Hopefully no one buys his bullshit.... or trusts them with their data.

[–] Devious_Thoughts@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Things to note:

The company, which makes most of its money from advertising, has struggled to draw new ad commitments under Musk’s ownership in part because brands are concerned about Musk’s approach to content moderation. The advertising industry is also in a slump, and several media companies have begun offering brands discounts.

So it seems like the discounting is an industry wide thing

X also warned advertisers that beginning Aug. 7, brands’ accounts will lose their verification—a gold check mark that indicates their account truly represents their brand—if they haven’t spent at least $1,000 on ads in the previous 30 days or $6,000 on ads in the previous 180 days, according to the email.

And the trusted method of giving advertisers ultimatums for your dying platform lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Arotrios@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd pay to keep my ads off of Twitter.

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Arotrios@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago

I mean if I had an advertisement for my organization, I would pay to keep it from appearing on Twitter. The potential brand damage from the association far outweighs any benefit from the additional audience.

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm reminded of the poochie episode of the Simpsons

"So, you want a lightly moderated free speech utopia that allows hate speech and misinformation, while at the same time is attractive to brands and advertising"

"Also, you should get paid for tweeting"

[–] danfromwv@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

"I'm fired aren't I?"

"Oh, yes"

[–] supercriticalcheese@feddit.it 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What I don't understand is the Twitter rebrand will it be limited to the logo or also the name?

Or will it be limited to X corp. as the parent company https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Corp.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Here's it is, straight from the horse's rear:

[–] exscape@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The name, and domain. It will be x.com with the X logo, and no birds anywhere.

[–] tankfox@latte.isnot.coffee 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

How will anyone ever search for anything on X? Just add X to the search term? 'Grandmas cookies X'? 'Cute bunny X'? 'Pen Island X'?

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Due to a weird Google quirk, you'll get better results if you surround the query with two additional X's, kind of like quotation marks. For example:

Grandmas cookies XXX

Cute bunny xxx

Pen Island xxx

[–] Master 3 points 1 year ago

In this case you would search "cute bunny x.com"

[–] Lowbird 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

... Gosh, that has much potential to make everything sound dirty or sleezy, too. 🤦 xxx

X.x

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemmy@linkopath.com 18 points 1 year ago
[–] mastermind@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] aeternum@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

lmao. twitter, i mean X, is doomed. It's going to fail. just a matter of when.

[–] chrisn 7 points 1 year ago

Wow, brands have to spend $1000 per month to keep their verification. I thought 8 per month was a rip-off!

[–] HappyMeatbag 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you. Paywalls frustrate the hell out of me.

[–] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 12 points 1 year ago

Yes, it's the cost keeping brands who put their names on stadiums away from twitter. I mean eX.

[–] szczur@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

The bird is dead!