This screams "white panic"
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
107 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10175 readers
27 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
They can't think this would withstand legitimate supreme court scrutiny. Though with the current court maybe they've got a longterm plan to delegitimize the supreme court entirely. Can't make heads or tails of these antics. Given current events and the state of the climate it's hard to believe any of these institutions think they'll be around long. Guess everyone's just clowning for the cheap seats at this point.
The Supreme Court is already delegitimized.
That court is a strange thing. One dies and another one rises. It’s like kings
load more comments
(2 replies)
You mention of a reasonable and logical court, but we have a fascist Christian right hate filled court that doesn't give two shits about precedence or ethics right now that would absolutely support this anti immigrant take.
Let’s end his term in office instead. Vote every GOP out of office in the next election.
Yup, instead of dealing with the shit coming out of the hose, let's just turn off the hose.
This is unconstitutional and based on incorrect comprehension of the 14th amendment. Gaetz is specifically leaning on the "and subject to" part in "born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”
However, this is clearly referring to exclude children born to diplomats who are not subject to jurisdiction because of diplomatic immunity. The exclusion does not apply to children born to undocumented immigrants.
It would be better if he introduced some legislation that said if you partake in child abuse, through interstate underage sex trafficking, or don't report or do anything about sexual abuse taking place in sports that you oversee, that you can't be a Congressman. Wish in one hand, and shit in the other.
It would be crazy if they actually get the votes to change The Constitution for this. I can't see it happening. But I've said that too many times and been wrong over the past almost decade or so.
Don't need to change the constitution if you can get your council of unelected elders to decide it always meant what you wish it said.
What a garbage person.
Can't wait for the follow up legislation of, "If you're not worth at least $5 million, are you really an American?"
Will it be retroactive? Without birthright citizenship can we just kick people like him out? One can dream....
AKA the "fuck you,I got mine" bill
So he's saying that non citizens are not subject to the jurisdiction of the US? So they all get diplomatic immunity?
I unironically support this.