Talking about lemmy in other subs about other stocks is perceived as dangerous to the superstonk community? I have no idea why they see it that way.
Anti-censorship
Censorship is bad, and is often difficult to seek accountability for (because such attempts are themselves censored).
This community exists as a safe place to report on instances and patterns of censorship among pro-GME, pro-DRS, and financial transparency accounts/content.
RULE: Due to the unfortunate risk of escalating tensions, please limit content in this community to factual record. Please do not include commentary on presumed motivations, intentions, shillery, name-calling, etc. If such commentary is included in screenshots, it must be redacted out.
I have a theory, and it involves the superstonk moderators getting compensated by third parties to suppress legitimate conversation.
I’m not up on the Reddit drama, so I don’t know where that mod team falls anymore, but I kind of hope whoever made those bans is trying to meta-game the Streisand effect to boost Lemmy.
The alternative (and apparent) explanation is that someone is really that dumb. It makes me sad to entertain that line of thought.
It doesn't effect them at all, therefore it's extremely dangerous...
Seems like what we saw with the first book vs plan fiasco of "operational efficiency" shares, then again during the heat lamp theory, and now that Gensler clarified book vs plan they are going extra crazy... Tinfoil me thinks the sub mods are plants and are ok with DRS because plan still allows them to fuck with the stock, but once people book in mass they are screwed.
If we hit resistance we know we're going the right way.
The shfs want us to stabilize the stock at ~20 and that's why the mods are so ok with receipt porn and such, there are critical price lines the shfs need to be between, too high and interest screws them, too high too fast and FTDs screw them, too low and the DRS count will skyrocket. As per the net short volume post yesterday they averaged shorts at the $20 range and they plan to keep it at that and wait us out and people give up so they can absolutely tank it with less risk
Absolutely crazy. Proactively searching r/Superstonk members comment history to ban? Why would they do this? Is there an AI that searches all things Superstonk that they're trying to censor results for?
Going to do a test. I was previously banned from Superstonk on a previous account for bringing up the obvious bed bath connections. I'm not subbed there now but I put a link to here on a comment in another sub. Going to join the sub now and see what happens. I will report back.
Nothing yet. My account age isn't even old to post on there so that might be a factor.
Incredibly idiotic. Jaw-dropping in both their incompetency and open fascistic inclinations.
Sorry for this. 🙁 You always followed the rules. Clearly unfair. Perhaps even suspicious... 👀
this is just comical at this point.