this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)
Anti-censorship
2 readers
1 users here now
Censorship is bad, and is often difficult to seek accountability for (because such attempts are themselves censored).
This community exists as a safe place to report on instances and patterns of censorship among pro-GME, pro-DRS, and financial transparency accounts/content.
RULE: Due to the unfortunate risk of escalating tensions, please limit content in this community to factual record. Please do not include commentary on presumed motivations, intentions, shillery, name-calling, etc. If such commentary is included in screenshots, it must be redacted out.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Talking about lemmy in other subs about other stocks is perceived as dangerous to the superstonk community? I have no idea why they see it that way.
I have a theory, and it involves the superstonk moderators getting compensated by third parties to suppress legitimate conversation.
It doesn't effect them at all, therefore it's extremely dangerous...
I’m not up on the Reddit drama, so I don’t know where that mod team falls anymore, but I kind of hope whoever made those bans is trying to meta-game the Streisand effect to boost Lemmy.
The alternative (and apparent) explanation is that someone is really that dumb. It makes me sad to entertain that line of thought.