this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
227 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

378 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skellener@kbin.social 37 points 1 year ago

Unchecked corporate greed.

[–] kestrel7@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago

That is a fucking great question coming from the people who are literally in charge of regulating these sorts of things.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because you corrupt morons (really, your predecessors) allowed it to be. I'm old enough to remember losing that fight.

[–] SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net 11 points 1 year ago

The predecessor are still around in the FCC. Also their replacement share the same views. This is just lip service meant to make it seem like they care

[–] AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.fmhy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Charging for both a connection speed and a limit is ridiculous. The latter is obviously a cash grab, but paired with different tiers of speed just screams "regulate me"

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Fuck regulation.

Take it all back. They used eminent domain to gift them monopolies on the lines to begin with. They abused it. Take it back away.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

It makes no sense to me... My connection speed already has a limit just as a function of that speed over time.

[–] kaboomski@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

FCC putting on a show and that's all, folks!

[–] KKSakura@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

having flashbacks to a time telcoms charged $$ per text. what a desperate move to extract every bit of $$ from the literal sharing of information

[–] DoucheAsaurus@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Man that was so bullshit, text messages piggyback on the wireless handshake so they cost telecoms literally zero money.

[–] BaconIsAVeg@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Or when CallerID was an additional $8/month. It's fucking DNS for telephone numbers. Can you imagine if ISP's had charged extra for DNS and everyone decided to just memorize IP addresses instead?

[–] tuxrandom@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How dare anyone call it data caps? Almost everyone has unlimited¹ data!

¹ High speed data available up to one nanobyte of traffic. Speeds reduced to 1 bit/year after the high speed volume is used up. Pictures of domesticated llamas do not use up high speed volume.

[–] Cylusthevirus@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Llamas don't count due to a bandwidth sharing agreement with Winamp, which as we all know really whips the llama's ass.

[–] Snapz 1 points 1 year ago

Old internet! One of us... One of us...

[–] Spitfire@pawb.social 15 points 1 year ago

One answer: $$$$$$$

[–] AllonzeeLV@vlemmy.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Really?

The same reason Reddit fucked everyone over, the same reason for mass tent cities in supposedly prosperous nations, the same reason we're terraforming the planet to be hostile to human life: metastasizing capitalism that entire societies now subsist to stoke the growth of, to its own slow, painful destruction.

An economy is supposed to be a tool to facilitate the distribution of goods and services for the benefit of society. Yet we allow millions to suffer to protect the beloved economy. We were tricked into doing it ass backwards to benefit a few assholes at everyone else's expense. That's why data caps, microtransactions, regulatory/governmental capture, our decrepit K-12 system in literal ruin, sub living wages, etc are still a thing. You name a major problem here in the US, and I'll show you something our hyper capitalist economy either causes, exacerbates, or stokes to keep the peasants at eachother's throats to stop them from looking up and uniting against the problem.

Capitalism can be heavily, heavily, heavily regulated to be of service to a society. The Nordic nations do it, western Europe did until they caught the US's insatiable greed disease. But without putting capitalism into a straight jacket, having a maximum income tied to a multiplier of the median wage, making corporations fund the society that provided the infrastructure for their success, and putting the needs of societal systems (utilities, education, social safetynet, etc) above the desires of the business community with the force of law, capitalism is a societal cancer that turns citizens against one another and gluts humanity's worst impulses exclusively.

And since the American oligarch capitalists captured their regulators completely under Reagan almost a half century ago, the FCC either won't indicate publically traded ISP greed, or won't do anything about it. Greed won, and we all lost even though many are deluded into being grateful little capital batteries for their owners.

[–] Snapz 1 points 1 year ago

I agree with most of this. Well said.

[–] Snapz 1 points 1 year ago

"Grateful little capital batteries!" In 7 fun shapes and 12 cool colors! Tell mom she'd give you her credit card if she loved you! Collect 'em all!!!

[–] ADHDefy@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Hey, I have the same question.

[–] JelloBrains@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Even if they wanted to do something about it, they can't. Comcast and friends made sure to tank Bidens pick for the open seat. Chances are they will continue to stonewall any pick with their donation puppets.

[–] MattTheProgrammer@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Knee-jerk reaction: I want to know why municipally-supported telecom monopolies are still a thing.... hmm??

[–] printerjammed@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Wow i've wondered the same thing! How funny! However, i am not the FCC