tuxrandom

joined 1 year ago
[–] tuxrandom@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago

Any store installing that crap (it fortunately hasn't arrived in my country yet) will lose me as a customer. I know it won't hurt them, but I'm not dealing with shit like that.

[–] tuxrandom@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

DNA matching is the only forensic science that's worth a damn, and only if it's done correctly.

And even that one is useless in case of identical twins.

[–] tuxrandom@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The category filters of electronics distributors used to be good (some still are). But then they started letting business people categorize the products, and now finding stuff without having a part number is basically a lottery.

[–] tuxrandom@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

That looks easy enough even for me to play it

[–] tuxrandom@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Das machen in letzter Zeit extrem viele, oft auch einfach mitten auf der Fahrbahn. Ist das die nächste Pandemie?

[–] tuxrandom@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And now you've got carmakers looking to charge by the month for features.

When I reach the point at which I am forced to buy a car like that, I'd just find out from where the feature gets controlled and hack in my own controller and a good 'ol switch.

[–] tuxrandom@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm honestly astonished that Google hasn't pulled the plug on Mozilla yet. After all, their missions completely and utterly oppose each other and Mozilla probably causes the biggest losses to Google.

If your prediction comes true, which isn't unlikely, Firefox forks that already exist would probably take its spot. Or privacy friendly Chromium based browsers. I know, the latter sounds like an oxymoron, but they exist and one of them I would be hated on for naming has actually been proven to have better out of the box privacy than Firefox.

[–] tuxrandom@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Essentially the EU does.

I'm not sure the rest of the world knows about the plans to make backdoors in encrypted communication mandatory, i. e. outlawing any form of effective encryption. They say it's against crime but I strongly believe it is mainly about total surveillance, maybe a little bit for censorship.

[–] tuxrandom@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

So we're gonna have to start using Tor against censorship in the so-called 'civilised' world as well.

[–] tuxrandom@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Serious question: Why do you use Chrome, a browser made by the world's largest advertising and spying company, when you give the slightest f* about privacy?

At least use Ungoogled Chromium if you're not gonna switch to something actually privacy-focused. Basically the same functionality, but without Google's spyware.

[–] tuxrandom@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I've gone to use the internet basically only on real computers and throwing a whole arsenal of annoyance and tracking blocking measures at it. The 'vanilla' internet experience has just become utterly unusable. If I use it on mobile, I do so in Brave as it is the only iOS browser that lets you use uBO filter lists and is able to fool websites into thinking you're on desktop.

[–] tuxrandom@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago

Did you know that X Corp. has a website for their hamster business as well?

 
view more: next ›