Europe

106 readers

1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

poVoq@slrpnk.net

Brussels says glyphosate safe enough for ‘full’ re-approval (www.politico.eu)

submitted 1 year ago by UnanimousStargazer@feddit.nl to c/europe@feddit.de

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] IoSapsai@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

While the EU's food safety regulator did not identify any "critical areas of concern" for human, animal and environmental health from glyphosate use in agriculture, it noted that the risk assessment could not be completed for a number of key endpoints. EFSA also acknowledged that there is evidence linking the use of the herbicide to neurotoxicity, damage to the microbiome and harm to biodiversity.

Then on what grounds did they decide that it's "safe enough"? The billions of € that Bayer lobbied to keep their blockbuster chemical on the market?

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] zazzie@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We are not allowed to use plastic straws, because climate/biodiversity etc, but the stuff that's literally killing off billions of insects is no problem... Guess the euros of Bayer are worth more than the planet...

[–] mackpack@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't believe it's that simple.

First of all: The ban on plastic straws is clearly an attempt to distract from more pressing isses when it comes to protecting the environment. That said, outside of a few people with disability, straws are basically pointless - banning them has no effect on most people's lives.

Herbicides/pesticides make agriculture more efficient. Banning an effective pesticide would probably lead to either decreased production of agricultural goods (bad for humans, especially poorer people) or an increased need for space (which might be worse for the environment than the pesticide itself).

Ultimately glyphosate wasn't banned due to its impact on the environment, but due to its suspected carcinogenicity.

[–] Tiptopit@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

At least speaking for Germany we used a.lot more space in nature in the past. The difference is, that in the past it gave room for animals to live, elwhereas today fields are like a desert for wildlife. As long as we had agriculture in a way where it gave place for wildflowers and thereby insects and used hedges, which protected lots of other species, we did not have that much of an ecological problem.

Of course it's better to use less space and have less of a risk for famines, but without the surrounding ecosystems, which we are destroying, this also does not bear much value.

[–] pzyko@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

oh ffs

[–] catarina@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Is there anything we can do, someone we can write to about this decision?

[–] Wirrvogel@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Do we copy & paste something Bayer pre-wrote again? Last time it was 5 years, now we are looking at a potential approval for full 15 years.

A summary was has happened so far:

article in German: https://www.boell.de/de/2022/01/12/glyphosat-zulassung-copy-paste-der-behoerden

article translated to English with google: https://www-boell-de.translate.goog/de/2022/01/12/glyphosat-zulassung-copy-paste-der-behoerden?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=de&_x_tr_pto=wapp