this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
48 points (100.0% liked)

Buy European

17 readers
91 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] cabbage@piefed.social 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I'm generally pretty happy with the results in Qwant.

The main thing I miss at this point is really support for !bangs. I use them all the time in DuckDuckGo, to search directly in !scholar or !wiki. Especially in Qwant there are some features missing, so if I for example want to be lazy and use the search bar as a calculator it would be nice to be able to search for !ddg 2+2.

But that's a minor criticism. For the most part it's a great tool, and I look forward to where they go with their own indexes.

Edit: Also, what's up with this graphic suggesting search engines (if you can call them that) as alternatives to Google Chrome.

[โ€“] snuggledick@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In Firefox (other browsers probably as well) you can add custom keywords for searches. For example visit Wikipedia, right click the search field and pick "add keyword" from the menu. As keyword enter "!wiki" or whatever you want and from now on you can just type "!wiki whatever" in the URL bar, no need to take the detour to duckduckgo or some other search engine.

[โ€“] cabbage@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks!! I should have done that ages ago!

[โ€“] klu9@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Me too! Just added:

  • !w for Wikipedia
  • !wt for Wiktionary
  • !wm for Wikimedia Commons
  • !mar for Marginalia-Search
  • !mo for Mojeek

Will probably think of a few more over the next few weeks.

[โ€“] pascal_f@infosec.exchange 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

@snuggledick
I've shortened it to "w" wikipedia, "g" Google, "d" duckduck, "a" amazon. Also possible with "1","2",...

Typing " w Fediverse" will directly open wikipedia with the article for "Fediverse".

Even when you have abandoned the pages above it will work with your free pages too.

@cabbage

[โ€“] SkavarSharraddas@gehirneimer.de 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At least desktop Firefox has something similar. Add a bookmark for e.g. "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%s" with the keyword "wiki", then when you type "wiki qwant" into the address bar you'll get the Wikipedia page.

I guess it's easier if you don't have to bookmark each search first, but at least for sites you search often I don't see the need for search engine provided bangs.

edit: As mentioned in another comment, there's a newer way where you just right-click a search box and go to "add keyword".

[โ€“] cabbage@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

I knew about this in theory, but I used DuckDuckGo for a long time and got too spoiled to a point where it didn't occur to me to just set it up myself.

Thank you for connecting the dots for me, I'll set ut up right away.

[โ€“] Blaze@feddit.nl 7 points 1 week ago

Giving it a try at the moment, doesn't seem too bad

[โ€“] calisti@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago

Why does this sharepic look like the Windows XP installer?

[โ€“] nuko147@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

I miss the time limits. They only have for last day, week and month. I used a lot the last year or 2 past years (they have custom date table) like Google has, and i go back to DuckDuckGo when i need more recent information but not that limited of one month.

[โ€“] Libb@jlai.lu 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It still uses Bing (Microsoft) as its backend, as far as I can tell. I know they want to partner with Ecosia to build something less... USA-dependent but I doubt that will happen overnight.

[โ€“] Blaze@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Is there a better alternative? Seems like all the alternative search engine rely on Bing or Google anyway

[โ€“] Libb@jlai.lu 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
  • Full EU search (not just a front-end): no idea.
  • EU front-end to US search engines, I would suggest Startpage as well as Qwant, I mean.
  • Independant and ad-free tracking-free innovative search engine but made in USA and also not free: Kagi. It's the one I've been using for almost two years, next to Qwant and to Startpage ;)
[โ€“] Blaze@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As stated in another comment

Startpage is owned by System1, an American Internet advertising company.

[โ€“] Libb@jlai.lu 1 points 1 week ago

I did not know that. Thx!

[โ€“] cabbage@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mojeek is probably the closest thing right now to a normal-looking search engine that is completely independent from Google and Bing. UK based.

[โ€“] Blaze@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago
[โ€“] cabbage@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

They'll start with the German and French web, so if you're searching in English you'll probably have to wait for a while indeed.

[โ€“] HeartyOfGlass@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Question for the Ecosia fans in the audience - The "we plant trees with ad revenue" is pretty cool, but they're just a front end for Google (or Bing), yeah?

If so, isn't their whole "we're green" thing misleading? Does it really support EU interests if the backend is still US?

[โ€“] neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They and Qwant are working together to create their own index

[โ€“] HeartyOfGlass@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

Hey, that's cool! I hope they can keep up the environmental message as they wean off Google/MS. Have they given a timeframe on when they hope to implement it? Seems like a huge task.

[โ€“] 31ank@ani.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I mainly use Startpage, also a ~~european~~ search engine (like qwant it uses microsoft/google search in the backend)

Edit: as nuko pointed out: they are owned by an american company

[โ€“] nuko147@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Startpage is owned by System1, an American Internet advertising company.

[โ€“] 31ank@ani.social 2 points 1 week ago

Pain didnt knew that, guess I'm switching back to Qwant, thanks for the info!

[โ€“] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Any reason I should choose Qwant over Duckduckgo? DDG having bangs and Qwant being not hosted in the US means I see them as about equal. So I wonโ€™t bother changing. Anything else Iโ€™m missing that Qwant beats DDG in that might make it worth changing.

(Iโ€™m definitely gonna change if the index thing works out)

[โ€“] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Qwant is building their own index, while DDG is using Bing's (Microsoft) index. I haven't tried Qwant yet, but I guess that would make a noticeable difference.

Yeah. I mentioned that in my comment at the bottom.