this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
164 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

10 readers
19 users here now

Protect your privacy in the digital world

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be nice, civil and no bigotry/prejudice.
  2. No tankies/alt-right fascists. The former can be tolerated but the latter are banned.
  3. Stay on topic.
  4. Don't promote big-tech software.
  5. No reposting of news that was already posted. Even from different sources.
  6. No crypto, blockchain, etc.
  7. No Xitter links. (only allowed when can't fact check any other way, use xcancel)

Related communities:

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 47 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Let's hope they'll be able to continue to use it. It (and all other messengers with proper E2EE) is already on track to be outlawed in Sweden and France, and the new government in Germany will be pro mass-surveillance, too.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Moral of the story? Use ~~selfhostable~~ decentralized messaging instead.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No way in hell my relatives are going to use a messenger I selfhosted. My brother doesn't even use Signal for whatever reason, even though even my grandmother has it.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That is the problem of getting another person to change something... A very valid problem but not inherent to decentralization.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Kinda is, though - regular people have a lot more trust in centralized services, and Signal has a very large userbase compared to anything selfhostable. And IME they really, really hate installing new messengers.

Plus, selfhosted E2EE would still be just as illegal as Signal. Many people won't be willing to participate in illegal activity, and if you just don't use E2EE on your selfhosted solution the usefulness seems rather dubious.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I don't think any ban on such selfhostable servers is enforceable at all.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago

It doesn't necessarily have to be enforcable to deter most people. At minimum, with such a ban there's zero chance to communicate with government agencies with E2EE.

[–] ReversalHatchery 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

well in the end it's just HTTPS traffic.. police has to search your phone to know if you are a user.

but if you federate (on clearnet), that could give away that you host it

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Well, technically, they could MITM the traffic similarly to how they did to jabber . ru. But a) there are mitigations for this and b) more importantly - they would need to bother. No one's going to bother doing it to a random family server that has attracted no previous attention.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 5 days ago

What if the government shuts off the app source (and source code) and makes it illegal for anyone to download or redistribute it?

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

We have never come across one that is as easy to use as Signal and has no problems with encryption, either that it can have its encryption turned off, it breaks easily or that it makes dubious claims with few-no audits to back them up.

Plus the common person enjoys the fun features of Signal or other easy messengers, most decentralised messages do not have these features, are indefinitely working on them or make them not as easy to use, leading to most being uninterested in those messengers.

We have tried most if not all of them, than most and they are definitely lacking as much as we wish they were not. Decentralised encrypted (or partially encrypted) messengers always seem to have problems whether it's with their encryption, moderation tools, connectivity or the lack of other features.

[–] J4g2F@lemmy.ml 30 points 5 days ago (1 children)

My dad just said in the WhatsApp group, why not move to signal. I tried moving friends and family before, but now that there has been anti meta media reports in some news sources. But especially reports on signal in almost every major newspaper and news source.

It seems not only a push because of privacy, but even more a anti big tech(especially us tech) and buy/use eu stuff push.

I don't mind the push I'm just curious if people stay on signal. Previous time there was a push to signal (during whatsapp technical difficulties and privacy push) people quickly want back to whatsapp.

Now my volunteer work, 1 friend and a family chat already moved to signal. The only thing I did was some explaining that you can just send images and so on. (That it's not something scary)

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago (3 children)

What are the major differences between what you can do on Whatsapp vs Signal?

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Whatsapp let's you donate your contact list and social network to meta for them to resell.

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It requires access to your contacts to work on Android. That is, you cannot type in a phone number. That's an intentional choice.

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 days ago

Oh, that's yucky. Thanks for the information, we haven't used it since it got bought by Facebook.

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago

The only real differences we can think of is:

Whatsapp unlike Signal doesn't have usernames meaning a phone number must be used to contact others on it, and that Whatsapp's report feature shares the unencrypted message and surrounding messages with Meta to give context for the report.

[–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago

it is just a messaging app, legit the exact same. group chats, image and video, previews to links i send, it even has a way higher level of customisability that i haven't found elsewhere.

[–] tmxyz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 days ago

A lot of VPN servers in Netherlands may have something to do with it.....

[–] Nanook@lemm.ee 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Why? Because the Dutch national broadcasters keep plugging it as an alternative to Whatsapp.

Aside... Two apps keep getting mentioned as alternatives, Signal and Element/Matrix, but in MHRO both are not viable as replacements.

Signal: still a US app, CIA funded, provides their encryption backbone to Whatsapp, recommended by governments & FBI. Matrix/Element: Developed in Israel, with ties to IDF, preferred by NATO (NI2CE)

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

you’re spreading lies lies lies FUD

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 3 points 4 days ago

Other than people you don't like living in the world here with us, do you have any proof of anything actually nefarious done by signal or matrix?

[–] Yxf@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

Signal is funded by the CIA now ? And I thought Element is in the UK?

[–] amelore@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I guess this means we're not switching to RCS then?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

RCS is not an open standard

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 3 points 3 days ago

Not to mention only available on certain phone brands and certain carriers (where I am, only one of major four).

[–] NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I use Telegram, like betamax have I backed the wrong horse?

[–] Scary_le_Poo 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Holy shit... Yes, yes you have.

[–] NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk 1 points 8 hours ago

Hah, thanks. I had no idea it was Russian backed. I dropped it over the weekend. The only issue is I'm now solely on WhatsApp as none of my friends/family are behind this movement.