this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
27 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

64 readers
8 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In short:

More than half of Australian companies have improved their gender pay gap, compared to last year. But for every $1 a man earns, women, on average, still only earn 78 cents.

The gender pay gap is not about "equal pay for equal work", but aims to quantify the difference between the average earnings of women and men in the workforce.

What's next?

Anyone can view the gender pay gaps at companies that employ more than 5 million Australian workers, and their plans to reduce the gap.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

So the man is only left with 22 cents??? 😯

I'll see myself out...

[–] Tau@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The gender pay gap is not about β€œequal pay for equal work”

Indeed, it seems to be primarily about making rage bait headlines.

Women work less hours on average, with considerably more working part time and those who work full time working less hours than men overall (so less overtime pay). What are you going to do to fix that gap, force women to work more? Between that and less women choosing to work in various higher paid and more physical/dangerous jobs (e.g. trades, mining) it's no wonder there's a difference.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's about working out what cultural forces are causing women to work less and helping to equalise those. It's also about how jobs traditionally seen as female-dominated being paid less than male-dominated work. You say

less women choosing to work in various higher paid

I say

Why is the extremely important work of early childcare and teaching not valued as highly as banking or mine working?

Why is the extremely important work of early childcare and teaching not valued as highly as banking or mine working?

This, I think is one of the biggest issues. But, it's not caused by employers discriminating against women. It's also not something individual companies can solve. I think it's an inherent flaw in our capitalist society. Caring for rich people could earn you a decent living, but if you're caring for the people who really need it... Most of them can't pay what it's really worth.

Also, if there's people willing to do the job at minimum wage, then there's going to be CEOs willing to hire them and take all the profit for themselves / shareholders.

[–] somedev@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago

I think calling it a pay gap is fairly disingenuous, really its about apparent descrimination. We should work ti eliminate descrimination while still hiring the best person for the job, otherwise you end up going the other way and you're back at square one.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, where I work we've hired every female applicant we've ever had and we're still at around 98% male. I'm not sure what we could even do about it.

[–] notgold@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Same in my industry. Rarely do any women apply.