this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
95 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

75 readers
12 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The shitshow in the Whitehouse yesterday really brought it to light - the U.S. can no longer be trusted with our secrets. Its time to leave 5 eyes. I would create a new intelligence sharing union with the other 3 members, on condition that they also leave. Inviting France and other EU states might also make sense.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Careful. Last time Australia threatened to deny America access to our intelligence apparatus they did a coup and took down our government

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thank you. I had no clue about this meddling. It's worth noting that M16 was involved as well, and the coup was conducted using archaic British monarchy laws.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are circumstantial reasons to suspect MI6 (N.B.: Military Intelligence. Not the number 16.), and the Queen's involvement certainly makes it possible. But there isn't actually strong evidence that they were involved, and there's a much less clear motive for it. (Some general motive in terms of Australia moving to the left, but not the specific motive of the threat to shut down a CIA-run facility in Pine Gap.)

By contrast, we now know that the Governor General (the Queen's official representative in Australia) at the time was referred to as "our man" by the CIA and he involved with organisations that we now know were CIA funded. The CIA also had their "coupmaster" (nicknamed for his known involvement in other coups) appointed as Ambassador to Australia.

Thanks for the extra info. Seems highly likely. Also yeah I know it's MI6, I swear I typed that. I'm gonna blame autocorrect 😤

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why not kick the US out of 5 eyes.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

I would think it mostly uses their infrastructure.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 12 points 2 days ago

Australian here, yes please, if we can cancel AUKUS at the same time save us all a bunch of money that'd be cool too

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're right but it would be enormously complex. We'd actually have to set up a new, separate system, first, then leave, and do that without upsetting a notoriously thin-skinned sociopath, who would still, during the process, have all our secrets.

[–] intelisense@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I disagree - everything we send goes to Moscow. Everything we get comes from Moscow. There is no value for us. There's nothing to lose by leaving.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm afraid there is, because Trump's vindictiveness won't stop with intelligence! Tariffs would be just the start.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wow, this is like the country level of justifying staying with an abuser. If the USA is unreliable and insecure, because of trumps, but more because the American people voted him in and their government sees fit not to prevent the kind of issues he's causing. Then it's better to leave and face consequences, and retaliate appropriately now, than suffer and still face those same consequences later.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

No, it isn't, because the first thing I said was:

You’re right

And the rest of my comment simply pointed out that it would be complex and risky - which is true.

[–] intelisense@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then he's already an aggressor. It s time to stand up bullies and fascists.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

Yes. Again, I did start my comment with 'You're right'. But it's also the case that what you - and I - are advocating for would, in the short term, be a boon to terrorism and organised crime, and may well have knock on effects for the economy, too.

My point is not that we shouldn't do it, but that it would have massive, unpredictable consequences!