this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
159 points (100.0% liked)

okmatewanker

5 readers
7 users here now

No foul language - i.e. French 🤮

Obviously satire, dozy wankers

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jonesy@aussie.zone 64 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"Even if you are doing something good in life, there is a lot of hate. I don’t really have any enemies, I think a lot of people just can’t see someone young, do good. I have a supercar at 20, they can’t put up with it."

Bro is trading crypto and thinking he's a modern hero. I hope someone tags the car again when it's cleaned.

[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 21 points 2 days ago

Doing good would be donating that money to a good cause, not buying a salesmans super car in attention seeking yellow.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe it's the "Superman does good. You are doing well." situation.

[–] jonesy@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

That sounds appropriate here.

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 41 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"it’s not much of a loss for me, I make £6-7,000 in my sleep."

Whereas most people would need to work full time for three or four months, whilst being very much awake, to make the same amount, you vile, immoral parasite.

When Wasseem was just pushing 19-years-old he hit his first £1 million after trading currencies, social media work, real estate and other avenues.

So, lucky trades, crypto(?), then - presumably - slum lord of some description.

Truly the cream of the crop.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yep that's exactly where I'm at.

I never understand where these people just obtain their free money glitch. I work hard and can barely sustain things even with absurdly cheap rent.

[–] Didros 11 points 2 days ago

You don't become wealthy from hard work. You need to lie about the value of your labor or get others to do tge labor for you.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Side note.

Back in 1960, minimum wage was $1.00/hour and a new Jaguar was about $6,000.00

If a minimum wage worker really wanted one, he could buy a supercar. $1.00 x 40 x 52 =2,080. Three years ot buy the car.

$15.00 x 40 x 52 = 31,000. Ten years work to buy that car.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 17 points 2 days ago

Three years of not paying tax or buying food, but I get your point

[–] DJDarren@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 days ago

I like how they've obfuscated the number plate of a bright yellow Audi covered in graffiti so no one can ID it.

Also, has he tried simply covering it up?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 7 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I know Lemmy hates rich people but am I the only one who thinks this is too much?

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i know liberals dont have a brain, but how bad must it be for fellow citizens until you accept that this car should not even exist in the first place as long as others have to live on the streets?

maybe try this:

  1. are you for a more or less fair world?

if your answer is yes, please proceed to question 2:

  1. how many people have access to a washing machine?

you'll notice: not even half of the people. and there are not enough metals on earth for everyone to have a washing machine.

  1. are you willing to give up you washing machine/car to prove you did not lie on question 1?

so owning this sportscar always makes you the asshole. always. you can not be a humble nice person and own an R8. I double checked: 100% assholes.

i know liberals dont have a brain,

First I'm not a liberal (at least not how you'd likely conceive of liberalism), second if you have valid ideas you should be able to defend them without resorting to ad hominem.

are you for a more or less fair world?

Mostly a more fair world, but honestly fairness is not the point. If everyone can live with a millionaire's quality of life and the ultra wealthy can't exert outsized influence on society then I don't care about the existence of the billionaire or even trillionaire. Yes, I know you can't have both within capitalism, but my point is that eliminating the ultra wealthy is a means, not an end. Writing shit on a random guy's car does nothing to improve the common person's life. Also just to make that clear: Even assholes have rights.

[–] 10001110101@lemm.ee 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nah, it's fine. As another commenter pointed out, owner said so himself:

it’s not much of a loss for me, I make £6-7,000 in my sleep.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean the guy is an arrogant prick, but still, just... why?

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 12 points 2 days ago

The "virgin" feels targeted so "the guy is an arrogant prick" is a good candidate for your why.

However even it was just opportunistic tagging of someone's conspicuous show of wealth, I'm definitely not against people becoming aware of how their community sees them as compared to how their Instagram following sees them.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Nah, I don't particularly care about property damage to wealthy people. They have plenty and it gets money back into the community they're stealing their wealth from. Especially when on a societal level, they care about property more than people.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago

For me it depends very much on the person owning the car.

From the phrasing of the words I'm convinced it's an insufferable prick, that besides owning the car has done much more to get this treatment.

But on this matter I remain convincible of the contrary.

[–] Trebuchet@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

Top marks on the post title