this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
501 points (100.0% liked)

196

669 readers
75 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
501
rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

Guys, at this rate I don't think the revolution's going to happen anytime soon.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 19 hours ago

maybe i've just instinctively avoided places like this but that isn't my impression at all, i find that a lot of people agree even if they don't call themselves leftist at all, in fact the whole problem is that basically everyone has nearly identical beliefs but can't bear the thought of voting for leftists who want to actually treat people fairly.

frankly the sentiment of this post feels like astroturfing to sow discontent.

[–] Denjin@lemmings.world 50 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the old enemy of the left: the left.

[–] Metostopholes@midwest.social 22 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

You leftists sure are a contentious people.

[–] AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You've just made an enemy for life!

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago

You've just made an enemy for ~~life~~ left!

ftfy

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 44 points 5 days ago

The differences of opinion are still there in irl leftist spaces but it alters how it feels when you’re actively doing something. Online you only see the differences in opinion but the real leftists aren’t just arguing details online (though they do that too) they’re running food banks and organizing housing cooperatives and coming out en masse when someone is being evicted. They’re putting together food packages and sending books to inmates. They’re hiking out into the desert to leave water for migrants and waiting by the train tracks to toss food up to travelers.

Bickering about details online might seem ridiculous to someone who isn’t involved but for the actually active leftists that part is only a sliver of their leftism and it’s not necessarily a bad thing— it’s very hard to imagine the world organized other than it is and one way we can be prepared to make the right decisions together when gaps appear is to discuss everything from every angle. I’m not going to pretend all the stuff online is in good faith and I suspect a good percentage of keyboard warriors who are not actually involved in leftward movement, but I do think in the context of real activism the bickering makes more sense.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 30 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

A lot of online leftists aren't doing anything because they don't know how to do something (or are scared, e.g. of losing their job or of getting brutalized by the police). If you aren't doing anything in The Real World(TM) there are only so many things left to do, and the internet is genuinely terrible about people who make mistakes or change their opinion.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 5 days ago (1 children)

As a leftist its also important to keep in mind we do differentiate between leftists who hold some opinions we disagree with compared to a Liberal who disagrees with us on nearly everything. Especially when said Liberals demand to be treated like leftists yet support imperalism, genocide, apartheid, capitalism, bigotry, and yet constantly call people "fake leftists" or "tankies".

[–] verdare 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Maybe I’m in a bubble, but I have yet to see anyone who’s not genuinely a tankie being accused of such.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ive seen people be called tankies for not supporting Kamala and opposing Liberal Democracy

[–] verdare 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

for not supporting Kamala

That’s wild. I’ve never heard that take and have a difficult time believing that it is common.

opposing Liberal Democracy

What alternative were they in favor of?

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That’s wild. I’ve never heard that take and have a difficult time believing that it is common.

World users were literally calling anyone who critiqued Kamala Russian bots, were you not paying attention for the last several months?

What alternative were they in favor of?

Depends, some leftists support a workers democracy, im personally an Anarcho Syndicalist

[–] verdare 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

World users

Ah. I think I see where the problem is. I believe my instance defederated from lemmy.world a while back.

You arent missing out on much

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago (24 children)

I've seen conservatives lob the word tankie around before like they do with other scary sounding political words. But not here on lemmy. "Tankie" has a very precise meaning on lemmy that everyone here seems to understand, despite a few tankies trying to gaslight people into thinking the term has "lost it's meaning".

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 26 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Right... Except this is true for all online communities. People talk a lot of shit and complain a lot. Cope with it or log off.

Or blame it on the left, lol, whatever makes you happy.

[–] buttfarts@lemy.lol 12 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I am left and this is so fucking true though. So many pussy-ass towel wringing gutless cowards just want to pick bones out of tofu than actually act to make a meaningful difference because they are frozen with indecision over acadmic moral quandries

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Bones out of tofu is a great expression.

[–] buttfarts@lemy.lol 3 points 1 day ago

Its a Chinese idiom that works very well

[–] frezik@midwest.social 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I wish we could all just agree on a few basics and do it. Like, can we support unions and do mutual aid? Yeah, it's not nearly enough to fix all our problems, but it's a start. Maybe it will help bring about anarcho syndicalist trotskyist solarpunk feminism, and maybe it won't, but it's a start.

[–] WammKD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I haven't figured out how to channel it into convincing others, yet (though I haven't done a lot of activism for, like, going on a decade now), but I have been having the thought, for the last 4 years, that focusing on tangible goals could really help us.

Just seeing the Republicans turn half a century of steadfast obsession into actually overturning Roe has me thinking we need material results fast.

Because, if the one constant for our side since the 60s has been anything, it's been a slow erosion at our ability to even effect change.

I feel like even the need for lockstep consensus to work together wouldn't be so direly needed if we had rank-choice voting and a dismantling of the two party system.

To use your union example, more unions mean a slow of concentration of wealth which means less influence for the wealthy upon our society including more stability so there's less desperation to vote for a Hail Mary solution like thinking Trump ever gave a single care about the price of eggs.

Just…really concentrating on tangible goals and carving out progress on them.

Of course, we'd need your aforementioned agreement, for that…

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

It's interesting how your comment undercuts the message that it's trying to express. You got the vocabulary wrong. It was a good try though.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah why should I be guilted into staying on Facebook?

[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 5 days ago

It's how we're conditioned to behave by society from birth. Break the rules and you get punished.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 17 points 4 days ago

This so fucking much

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I need someone to explain to me why I should be guilted into staying on Facebook, Twitter, etc.

By this logic I should be on truth social trying to make it “a better place.” This is fucking stupid. The sites are built on rage bait, The algorithms want to keep you angry and fighting with people online. You are fighting against massive companies who have weaponized your data against you for the purpose of making sure you hang around. The only correct decision is to leave.

We need to build our own spaces and defend them.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I am honestly a bit impressed by how you managed to read all this into OP's pic. Literally nothing there is about using Facebook, being guilted(???) into using it, nothing suggests that leftists shouldn't build their own spaces. Are you really responding to the pic or to something else?

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I actually did intend to respond to a specific comment yes

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well then... Your comment showed up first when I opened the comments, and without any other context it baffled me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 5 days ago

The Left: Fractured Butt Hole. 😞

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 5 days ago

Except in crisis, a society benefits when everyone does nothing renegade.

The problem is we're in crisis, largely due to a lack of information about the scope and breadth of that crisis.

[–] mehdi_benadel@lemmy.balamb.fr 4 points 5 days ago
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 4 days ago

From my casual observation, leftists tend to be a lot more individualistic and tribalistic than people on the right, to the point where they would much rather join the right just to spite another left group.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Freedom is a humanist value. Curtailing freedom to do wrong is of course acceptable. Something most people here won't like is that the best gender/sexuality is hetero-CIS. That doesn't make the freedom not to be forced into the best humanist production of 20+ births per lifetime to not be a valid freedom. A feminist/queer supremacy can define wrongs as hiring practices, or not believing their preferred side in any accusation.

Autocracy, oppression, warmongering is not a left/right exclusivity. Warmongering against those less liberal than "us" is common. All of these are huge wrongs, not the slightestly cured by "leftism". Freedom has to be more important than good, because there is no non-evil way of imposing "only good", or especially, letting a ruling autocracy corrupt definition of good.

UBI is especially important as a solution to divisiveness. It is incredibly empowering to workers, and empowers both forming relationships, and empowering those unhappy into leaving relationships.

[–] Zero22xx@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 4 days ago

'Centrists' don't help much either because they too hold the left to a higher standard than the right and always seem to be looking for any excuse to whip out the ol' "so much for the tolerant left" so that they can feel better about themselves when they vote for who they really wanted to vote for anyway.

People on the right can say in plain English "I want to dismantle women's rights and put all gay people into camps" and the 'centrist' will be like "hmmm yes that seems like a valid political opinion". But the moment someone on the left drops the high road shit for once and bites back, the 'centrist', clutching pearls is like "See? This is why I'm supporting the bigots that hate everyone, because you SWORE and that's unacceptable!"

load more comments
view more: next ›