this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
39 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

1459 readers
124 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I would say Atari but that's just low-hanging fruit because it's a generation I never really got to play as it was before my time. But I am starting to fall out of nostalgia for the NES which is held dearly in a lot of hearts of retro gamers and gamers that have enjoyed what that system had to offer for a few decades.

I know it had offered a lot of classics and gave so many games their start, most of which are still with us today like Final Fantasy for example.

The best guess I can give about why I don't care as much about that generation is because it is very oversaturated when you start entering the world of retro gaming. For retro gaming I prefer SNES and Genesis, because I technically did start playing those when I was born and they were first released. So I have more favorability towards those than the NES and generations before and during it.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I would say Atari but that’s just low-hanging fruit because it’s a generation I never really got to play as it was before my time.

Is there a word for imagined nostalgia? You could play them today, but I think you’d discover that not many Atari 2600 games were actually good.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

Is there a word for imagined nostalgia?

Whatever the word is, UFO 50 captures it perfectly.

[–] Iapar@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

Isn't that that just what retro means?

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Imagined nostalgia is for sure a thing, I felt some kind of nostalgia playing PokΓ©mon blue even though it was made before I was even born, same for the wild west internet days I never really got to experience

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

Weirdly enough, Sega Genesis games for some reason. Except for Sonic. They weren't as good as SNES games, I find.

They just feel like they were trying too hard to be 'cool'. Often the graphics and music also didn't appear as refined as the SNES. And the controller layout sucked. I hated the D-pad and 3 buttons wasn't enough. Additionally, there was no standard for which button was for jumping attacking and third function. Whereas in the SNES it was pretty standard.

[–] mo_lave@reddthat.com 7 points 1 month ago

The 1994-2006 era, roughly the time between the release of Transport Tycoon and Civilization IV

[–] Lokoschade@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Everything that came before the Gameboy and most consoles. My parents had an weird arbitrary rule about my sister and me not being allowed to have consoles but Gameboy or later Nintendo DS were fine. And as a kid I wasn't really aware of the existence of PS Vita or PSP so those I'm also not really nostalgic for.

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

7th Generation of consoles (PS3, X360, Wii) was pretty meh. The Wii was cool for a time, but it soon became flooded with shovelware and finding a good game was a chore. The PS3 was lackluster at launch and only got its footing at the tail end of the generation. The X360 had very few exclusives because most of their stuff was available on Windows.

This was also a time when apparently every dev, publisher and their mom operated under the presumption that "brown filter = rEaLiSm". That, and bloom. Lots and lots of bloom. Good riddance.

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

*angry halo and GOW noises.

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

N64 adventure games (except Mario). They were just janky messes with horrible frame rage camera issues, target hitting issues and weird looking environments. Looking at you Castlevania, but I can't think of any others that I would want to play again either.

[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 5 points 1 month ago

Anything pre-NES era and PlayStation. I had a ZX Spectrum, which was a British console that was around in the 80s. It had lots of fun games which were plentiful and cheap, they’d only be a couple of quid each. But most of them were just really basic versions of what we have now and I have no intention of getting my old machine out to play them.

I’m not nostalgic for the PlayStation because I always felt like the only audiences it catered for were the Japanese and people who liked all that money-grabbing type of stuff, like FIFA. Neither of those were for me.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago
[–] iii@mander.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

Everything post ps2

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago

The early 2000s.

I was a Genesis kid. Loved the 16 bit era, and also had plenty of 8 bit. Much love all around.

Got into PC gaming in the 1990s. Loved strategy especially, and it's something you can't do well on 16 bit.

But the early 2000s were relatively dark. 3d graphics were around and pretty shitty by today's standards. There was a lot of straight garbage in the gaming market that I don't want to experience again. There was good stuff, like HL2, but on the whole things were bad.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 month ago

I stopped caring about games once they went 3D.

Late 80's 8 bit. Sure it was great back then playing on Atari 65 or C64, but those games in retrospect simply fucking suck, nearly all shooters and platformers.

[–] SpaceFox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

The 70s, 80s and 90s as I wasn't born yet

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Early always-online consoles and their multiplayer-as-main-mode bullshit.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Xbone? Not sure if there was anything before that. Cause 360 could be played offline. Aswell as PS3.

[–] Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Honestly, all of it. Not a video game fan even having been raised through its development. I have zero nostalgia for any of it.

[–] apotheotic 1 points 1 month ago

The ps3/xbox360 era - despite it being during my most "formative" gaming years, I feel like there was a lot of "samey" game design. Theres a similar issue at the moment, to be honest, at least in the AAA space, but indie titles might make me look back with nostalgia on this era when its old enough to be nostalgic.

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

The generation where I did not have adult responsibilities to prioritize

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

NES is a good one, it was juuust about part of my time in that a couple of people I rarely saw had one and I loved playing it with them when I did seem them, but really that's because I didn't at the time have a games machine or a computer so anything would have been good. I've played a few of the games and they were alright, pretty good. I got an original NES console with several games as an adult and was super excited because it's so classic and retro and I found that much as I love owning it, I really couldn't stand playing it for more than a few minutes. The games are just, kinda boring and they feel very, incomplete. They suffy some of the same problems as the Atari games I played just to see what the time period was like, those Atari ones in particular feel very unfinished, like someone thought it'd be interesting to try making a game, had one attempt, made something like a sort of prototype and then got bored and just shoved it on the market and moved on to a different hobby. The NES games weren't as bad as that, but there was a similar feel of lack of consideration for the actual player. To me, it the NES kind of represents when games were starting to get good, which I think would annoy a lot of people that were gamers for a long time before that, because it's always annoying when younger people make these proclamations totally ignorant of the time they're speaking about, but in my head at least that's what the NES generation represents. It's the starting point of what was to come, with some flashes of brilliance and a lot of meh and even the really good bits aren't as good as their later more refined iterations.