this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
333 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

234 readers
64 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Godort@lemm.ee 95 points 1 month ago (3 children)

To be fair, the protein folding thing is legitimately impressive and an actual good use for the technology that isnt just harvesting people's creativity for profit.

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 60 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The way to tell so often seems to be if someone has called it AI or Machine Learning.

AI? "I put this through chatgpt" (or "The media department has us by the balls")

ML? "I crunched a huge amount of data in a huge amount of ways, and found something interesting"

[–] keepthepace@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 month ago

Actually I endorse the fact that we are less shy of calling "AI" algorithms that do exhibit emergent intelligence and broad knowledge. AI uses to be a legitimate name for the field that encompasses ML and we do understood a lot of interesting things about intelligence thanks to LLMs nowadays, like the fact that training on next-word-prediction is enough to create pretty complex world models, that transformer architectures are capable of abstraction or that morality arise naturally when you try to acquire all the pre-requisites to have a normal discussion with a human.

[–] buttfarts@lemy.lol 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

omg what is even the point of scientific progress and the advancement of human knowledge unless one specific person gets all the glory. What is science even for if not the validation of some human's individual ego.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

What is science even for if not the validation of some human's individual ego.

Satisfaction of personal curiosity with goverment funding

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

the technology that isnt just harvesting people's creativity for profit.

It's the system harvesting people's creativity for profit. Capitalism did it, capitalism does that, capitalism will always do that. In best case. Otherwise it will harvest people entirely.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 71 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

The whole "all AI bad" is disconnected and primitivism.

John J. Hopfield work is SCIENCE with caps. A decade of investigations during the 80s when computational power couldn't really do much with their models. And now it has been shown that those models work really good given proper computational power.

Also not all AI is generative AI that takes money out of fanfic drawers pockets or an useless hallucinating chatbot. Neural networks are commonly used in science as a very useful tool for many tasks. Also image recognition is nowadays practically a solved issue thanks to their research. Proteins folding. Dataset reduction. Fluent text to speech. Speech recognition... AI may be getting more track nowadays because the generative AIs (that also have their own merit, like or not) but there is much more to it.

As any technological advance there are shitty use cases and good use cases. You cannot condemn a whole tech just for the shitty uses of some greedy capitalists. Well.. you can condemn it. But then I will classify you as a primitivist.

Scientific theory that resulted in practical applications useful to people is why the nobel prize was created to begin with. So it is a well given prize. More so than many others.

[–] msage@programming.dev 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

'AI hate' is usually connected with insane claims like 'we have "reasoning" model'.

That shit needs to die in fire.

I'm still waiting for the full-planet weather model. That will be something.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm still waiting for the full-planet weather model. That will be something.

That's going to be a hard one, given that past weather patterns are increasingly not predictive of future weather patterns, because something keeps dumping CO2 into the atmosphere and raising the global temperature

[–] seemefeelme@infosec.pub 3 points 1 month ago

Ooooopsieeees it was me 🙈

[–] Tja@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago

You sir or madam give me hope that there are still reasonable people on the internet. Well written.

Wait, are you an AI bot defending itself...?

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Oh, sure, Mr. Enshittifist, you can call me that.

[–] IsoSpandy@lemm.ee 44 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I don't get the ai hate sentiment. In fact I want ai to be so good that it steals all our jobs. Every single "worker" on the planet. The only job I don't think they can steal is that of middle management because I don't think we have digitized data on how to suck your own dick. After everybody is jobless, then we would be free. We won't need the rich. They can be made into a fine broth.

Sarcasm aside, I really believe we should automate all menial jobs, crunch more data and make this world a better place, not steal creative content made by humans and make second rate copies.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem with AI isn't the tech itself. It's what capitalism is doing with it. Alongside what you say, using AI to achieve fully automated luxury gay space communism would be wonderful.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

Maybe problem is, you know, capitalism?

[–] Sas 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The problem is that it will be the rich that are the owners of the AI that stole your job so suddenly we peasants are no longer needed. We won't be free, we will be broth.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Then you have a choice.

Option 1. Halt scientific and technological progress and be robbed anyway because if capitalists do not get more money out of tech they are getting it out of making you work more hours for less money.

Option 2. End capitalism.

[–] Sas 6 points 1 month ago

I vote option 2

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Option 3. Get a job as part of the 5% of the population still employed in serving the various security apparatuses protecting the rich fucks -- you could be a soldier, cop, or government official.

Better to be part of the boot than be the poor fuckers getting stepped on, right? You can sleep easily knowing you have it slightly better than the other 95% of the underclass.

[–] IsoSpandy@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well you see 100 people won't be able to make soup of trillions. But you know what we a trillion people can do? Run the guillotine for a 100 times

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

Well you see 100 people won’t be able to make soup of trillions.

You should check out the climate catastrophe sometime.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

I don't know if you've been paying attention to everything that's happened since the industrial revolution but that's not how it's going to work

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 6 points 1 month ago

Had me in the first half, not gonna lie

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would love AI. Still waiting for it. Probably 50 years away (if human society lasts that long).

What I hate is the term being yet another scientific term to get stolen and watered down by brainless capitalists so they can scam money out of other brainless capitalists.

[–] Randomguy@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What I hate is the term being yet another scientific term ~~to get stolen and watered down~~ created by ~~brainless capitalists~~ researchers and scientists so they can ~~scam money out of~~ describe ideas to other ~~brainless capitalists~~ researchers and scientists.

The term AI as we use it today has been in use in the field of computer science for more than 50 years

The term that you describe as AI is what researchers in the field have called AGI for more than a decade.

The only place where AI is used to mean a artificial intelligence on the same level of humans is in fucking science fiction.

Is it hard to comprehend that when people say AI on the topic of something made by computer scientists they refer to the thing computer scientists call AI?

Do you go on gaming conversations and say: "Um... Akshually... it's not AI... it's just a behaviour heuristics 🤓"

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Brainless capitalists" weren't invented in 2019.

[–] Randomguy@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh yes, Alan Turing, such a famous capitalist.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I suppose you did say more than fifty years, which technically includes someone that died in 1954, but he also defined it in a way that even current models don't meet, so here we are, back at brainless capitalists.

[–] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 1 points 1 month ago

For me, it's because AI is referring to a LLM, which is not AI. Also, these LLMs use a crap load of energy to do things that we can currently do ourselves for much less energy.

But actual AI? Yes, please!

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Today I learned about AI agents in the news and I just can think: Jesus. The example shown was of an AI agent using voice synthesis to bargain against a human agent about the fee for a night in some random hotel. In the news, the commenter talked about how the people could use this agents to get rid of annoying, reiterative, unwanted phone calls. Then I remembered about that night my in-laws were tricked to give their car away to robbers because they ~~thought~~ were told my sister in law was kidnapped, all through a phone call.

Yeah, AI agents will free us all from invasive megacorporations. /s