this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
87 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

308 readers
8 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/21396125

Stephen Starr in Hamtramck, Michigan
Mon 14 Oct 2024 11.00 EDT

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 37 points 1 month ago

She had so many chances to make this election easier. Could have had a Palestinian talk during the DNC, and that would have likely changed this story.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because Trump who literally said Muslims should wear a "Special ID at all times" back in 2015 is obviously gonna be much better....

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Biden/Harris aren't even giving them the chance to wear the special IDs, they wiped out Gaza and took out a few churches and Christians in the process too

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump meant that for Muslims living in America.

Additionally, Trump has talked about wanting to use nuclear weapons in Gaza multiple times. So I don't know why you think he's "better" for the region

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No one said he is better but neither are Democrats, both are equally awful for the region.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Some have falsely claimed he wants a ceasefire, while he has talked about "ending the problem quickly", he has clarified he means by blowing Palestine straight to Hell by throwing everything America's got at it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] apotheotic 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Context:

  • I am not an american, so there may be some missing knowledge for me about the american electoral system.
  • I abhor Israel's genocide in Gaza, and I abhor the biden administration's support of (and Harris' seeming continued support of) the genocide.
  • My understanding is that Trump is just as, if not more supportive of the genocide in Gaza, and on top of this has his sights on doing some truly terrible things in the US re: minorities, trans rights, etc

So with that context, my question is thus: It seems clear that Trump wouldn't change anything about the genocide in Gaza, and that he would bring more evil than the current status quo. So if you're an american voter, you obviously can't let Trump get in. But, Harris is gross to vote for as well, even if its a "lesser of the two evils" thing. What do you do? As far as I understand its basically one or the other, you dont really have any third party to vote for right?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago (11 children)

It's more of a difference in practical values. At what point does the "lesser evil" itself become intolerable evil? Some people insist that you should vote for Hitler over 101% Hitler, that there is no intolerable level as long as there is a miniscule difference. Others have firm red lines in the sand, like genocide, where they advocate for abandoning them and pushing as hard as you can, even advocating for moves outside the electoral system like revolution.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ResoluteCatnap@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Your understanding is solid for not being an American. You're not missing anything substantial-- people who are voting 3rd party think that the "dems need to learn" and that the dems can't do whatever they want so their vote is supposed to be a punishment. But as you point out that if they really cared about this issue then they would vote for Harris because trump will do worse on this issue and all around. The time to make changes to our political system is not when you vote for president, but in the years leading up to that.

In other words, people voting for 3rd party or Trump over this issue are morons. It sucks that our political system is what it is but if you knowingly vote for anything other than the candidate promising not-fascism, then you are supporting fascism.

I just hope enough democrats understand this. I'm not happy with gaza either but our country is still recovering from the first shit show presidency of Trump, and fascists are closely watching this election.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

This is limiting the scope of thought to four years.

Democrats winning means genocide becomes fully normalized forever, whereas if Trump wins it means four more years of genocide but the democrats will have learnt they cannot ignore the left.

In the short term Trump will be more damaging, but in the long term it is very debatable which is worse.

[–] darth_tiktaalik@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Democrats winning means genocide becomes fully normalized forever,

Even more so if the guy who openly said murder is a genetic predisposition wins.

Who for the record is Donald J Trump.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Genocide is already normalized for republicans. If democrats get to normalize it as well, there will be no non-genocide option in 2028.

When you never draw a red line you signal that they can keep pushing the boundaries of evil.

[–] apotheotic 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hmm. I can understand this perspective. I guess its a bit tough. As a trans person I would find it very hard to do anything that isn't actively working against trump being in power, because if he gets in power it's very likely that my life will be in danger (if I was an American). But at the same time, as mentioned before, it wouldn't be an easy sell for me to be voting pro-harris.

I guess your scenario doesn't mean you're going to vote for trump, just that you'll vote third party or spoil your ballot?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] authorinthedark@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 month ago

they exist, but the electoral system is designed to keep them from gaining power. And since (most) states use first past the post, secondary preferences aren't taken into account, so if you vote third party when you would have voted for Harris otherwise you increase Trumps chance of winning. There's some argument to be made that voting third party or not voting might influence democrats in the future to change their policy to appeal to those voters but I don't know how realistic that is.

[–] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You always vote against the fascist and the guy who staged a coup. It's that simple.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This is correct. There are plenty of actions to be taken outside voting, but voting is quick, easy, and the bare fucking minimum. Vote and do whatever else you think you should do. If you don't vote (or just throw it away) then you're complicit in whatever happens.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago

Not just in Michigan ;)

[–] The_Che_Banana 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Oh boy, that'll teach 'em....you know, the party where they absolutely listened to the people who didn't want Hillary just because "it was her turn".

yup...this'll fix it!

[–] darth_tiktaalik@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

If anything handing over the presidency to Trump would be incentive for Democrats to move further to the genocidal right.

[–] darth_tiktaalik@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Great so now we can have a more certain Trump presidency. Why limit yourself to just one genocide when you can have this guy in power here too:

“How about allowing people to come to an open border, 13,000 of which were murderers, many of them murdered far more than one person, and they’re now happily living in the United States. You know now a murder, I believe this, it’s in their genes. And we got a lot of bad genes in our country right now,”

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Biden already started the Lebanon genocide. You're going to need to up that Trump talking point to three genocides.

[–] darth_tiktaalik@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Here's a talking point for you, but from the Republican party's policy platform:

DEPORT PRO-HAMAS RADICALS AND MAKE OUR COLLEGE CAMPUSES SAFE AND PATRIOTIC AGAIN

By "pro-Hamas" they mean all the free Palestine protestors.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Is that the third or the fourth genocide?

[–] enbee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

stop paying your taxes too, that shit is funding the genocide

[–] basmati@lemmus.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Right behind you (͠≖ ͜ʖ͠≖)

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 1 month ago

My man... This the FO stage and TAXMAN will deliver FA stage.

Tax evasion is a crime to served for the elites and their regime whores.

Wouldnt recommend this to anyone unless you are in the club

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago
[–] limitsomething@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why would they even vote ?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To show the votes she lost by going in on genocide, instead of leaving it to minimization by the media.

[–] limitsomething@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I know, I was asking why are they even participating when both of them are against Palestinians and will make the genocide even worse ... also it will be useless if she won

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are voting for Stein and Crúz.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Good bye frying-pan, hello fire.

load more comments
view more: next ›