this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
31 points (100.0% liked)

movies

7 readers
2 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 30 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I was interested when I heard it was going to be a musical.

I was turned off when I found it was just licensed music and would not have any original songs. Like... What's the point of making a musical if you're not gonna make new songs specifically for the story?

[–] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 8 points 4 weeks ago

Ahhhh this is the first time hearing it isn't original music. I took for granted that a musical would have original songs.

[–] Teils13@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If they can somehow fit pre-existing music into the film, it can be fun to see essentially several high budget musical clips of known songs at once and also a film. Bollywood can be good at this. That is clearly not the case with Joker 2, but if they had made psychological mad sequences with Bonnie and Clyde having killing and crime sprees with psychedelical metal music etc, it could work.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 4 weeks ago

That's thoroughly disappointing to hear

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Neither Phillips nor Phoenix was even sure about making a sequel and, for a time, contemplated putting on a Broadway show instead, before ultimately committing to the movie and bringing aboard Gaga in a role inspired by the comic book character Harley Quinn. The idea for the sequel came to Phoenix in a dream, and he and Phillips brought the idea to Emmerich, according to sources.

In the end, some are saying that Joker: Folie à Deux is a very expensive art film. But when asked who the intended audience was, one outside source sums it up this way: “For Joaquin.”

I'd have loved to be a fly on the wall:

I don't want to make a sequel movie to Joker.

Well wait until you hear this: Joaquin has had a dream...

Oh dear.

And they are going to pay you $20M each!

I'm listening.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe Joaquin's dream was about him receiving a $20m check.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 3 points 4 weeks ago

"I had a dream... of cheeky cash-grab"

[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 weeks ago

In the end, some are saying that Joker: Folie à Deux is a very expensive art film.

Oh wow, that is exactly what I said to my friends as we left the theater

[–] steve_floof@lemm.ee 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Box office isn’t everything, not anymore. They’ll make it back in collectible trash they sell to incels

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 weeks ago

Are there enough incels who are willing to pay for Joker merch?

[–] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If only it weren't a musical

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 9 points 4 weeks ago

The musical aspect was the only reason I was even a little interested

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

Because they have money to burn?

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 5 points 4 weeks ago

If they’d put in double stair kicks this would have made $2 billion.