this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2022
4 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

1454 readers
143 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] incici@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[โ€“] dessalines@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Google glass, these spying eyeglasses that google made a huge push for back in like 2015. Turns out even then nobody wanted google spying on everything they can see, and going out in public looking like a hailcorporate tool.

[โ€“] X51@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I am pretty sure that the head of our repair group was using some Google glasses for some motor repair training. The teachers were remote and the Google glasses were their eyes for reviewing the progress of the trainees.

[โ€“] morrowind@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

That was less so because of the privacy issues and more because they were very experimental but google billed them as viable. If google had stuck to it and fixed the issues I would argue they would be a bit of a thing today.

[โ€“] Nickygl@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Google glass ๐Ÿ‘“ ๐Ÿ˜…

[โ€“] const_void@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[โ€“] ttmrichter@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Please specify which "crypto"?

Cryptography is doing just fine, thank you very much. I presume you meant "cryptocurrency" here?

[โ€“] roastpotatothief@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Bitcoin should have led to global currency reform, for a start. That failed. It could still lead to energy reform and other important societal progress. But regulation and other factors are killing it.

[โ€“] ttmrichter@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Bitcoin and its alternatives could never have been a currency. It's eminently unsuited to that role. (It's great for Ponzi schemes, extortion schemes, and other criminal enterprises mind.) And how does "using more energy than a medium-sized nation while doing three orders of magnitude fewer transactions than even ONE payment processor" translate to "energy reform"?

Please, dude, stop being a cryptobro. It's a really bad look.

[โ€“] roastpotatothief@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I've spent too much time explaining currency theory to purple who aren't really interested. So if you have a specific question I can answer it. But not many questions and not a debate.

[โ€“] jiaminglimjm@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[โ€“] abbenm@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Huh? Peertube is probably the second strongest activitypub based project after Mastodon, at least going by fediverse stats.

Youtube and Twitter are bigger, but I think the fediverse is a long term project, and organic, active and growing userbase, meeting real use cases, attracting development all while fulfilling an underlying vision are the criteria for success, and I think it's pretty good on those measures.

[โ€“] Thann@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

The year of ~~desktop linux~~ Peertube supremacy will be coming soon!

[โ€“] Victim_0@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago
[โ€“] aeroplain@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago
[โ€“] morrowind@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago
  • smartwatches: flopped hard because they couldn't prove their value over your phone. They're slowly coming back now as companies see their value lies in a few key things like fitness
  • smart wear (mostly google, as usual)
  • I guess a lot ar / vr stuff was hyped before the tech was really ready and went nowhere
  • and as others have mentioned most stuff related to web3 and blockchain
  • quibi?
[โ€“] Bloodwrych@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

One could arguably say the PC game "Star Citizen". A decade later and close to half a billion raised and still nowhere near completion

[โ€“] jucheguevara@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

liberal democracy

[โ€“] YouLookGraphics@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Oh god, where do I even start?

  • VidMe and Vlare.
  • Vanillo.
  • 3D TV's.
  • Onecoin.
  • XML.
  • Ubuntu Touch.
  • OS/2 WARP. (unfortunately.)
  • Mir and Unity. Not the game engine.
  • PeerTube.
  • Foldable smartphones.
  • Virtual assistants.
  • Dual-screen smartphones.
  • Ruqqus.
  • Zune.
  • Windows Phone.
  • Firefox OS.
  • Silverlight.
  • Tru64.
  • Theranos.
  • ZTE Hawkeye.
  • PlayStation Home.
  • There.
[โ€“] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

To be fair, at least Theranos and Onecoin were outright scams. They were never intended to be the next big thing so much a get even richer quick scheme.

Also, why XML? It's used everywhere.

[โ€“] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

I had to do a double take there. I read Theranos as Thanos the first time around :)

[โ€“] morrowind@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Virtual assistants weren't as big as expected, but I wouldn't say they flopped.

Also, peertube, foldable smartphones, linux mobile (ubuntu touch might be an exception) are all still in early stages, its a bit early to say they flopped.

[โ€“] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
  • Ubuntu Touch, unfortunately. Though UBports is keeping it going.
  • Vidme and Vlare, which were both potential alternatives to YouTube but were shut down due to lack of funding.
[โ€“] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Vidme and Vlare, which were both potential alternatives to YouTube but were shut down due to lack of funding.

This starts to make sense when you realize that YouTube was confirmed to NOT be making a making a profit as late as 2015, and potentially still isn't. Apparently, having a profitable video streaming business is just hard. The only reason that Google can do it is because they're rich AF and can afford to do the shotgun method of continuing to operate it at a loss for a long time and hope it becomes profitable eventually.

[โ€“] miguel@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • Zune / Windows phone
  • Smart glasses
  • GNU Hurd
  • Microsoft Silverlight
  • Firefox OS / Devices
  • (soon) SpaceX / Blue Origin
  • Make America Great Again ๐Ÿคฃ
[โ€“] abbenm@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[โ€“] SrEstegosaurio@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

A kernel made by GNU

[โ€“] pingveno@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Make America Great Again

I'd argue that MAGA was successful for its true purpose. It is a slogan that perfectly encapsulates a reactionary mindset. Actually improving America is secondary.

[โ€“] SudoDnfDashY@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I believe there is a fork of Firefox OS made for flip phones.

[โ€“] CHEFKOCH@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • NFT
  • Web3
  • Metaverse
  • Matrix 4 - my opinion

Need more?

[โ€“] AltF2@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Honestly I think web3 will never hit mainstream, mainly because its inferior in the things that regular people care about, e.g. speed and simplicity

[โ€“] morrowind@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Web3 was never anything at all. Just a buzzword. Ask people to actually describe what web3 is. Nobody can name anything specific that would be an improvement.

[โ€“] chiefstorm@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

facebook metaverser, or is it too early to name that yet? Heh heh

[โ€“] const_void@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

The Metaverse demo video showed a shop for NFTs. Bonus flop.

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ