this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
143 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

40 readers
4 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rediphile@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago

The Atlantic

[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think their idea is to put it into new plastic products.

[–] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So it can go back into the ocean.

[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Gotta stay in business somehow.

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

I wonder if they figured out how to remove the garbage without hurting the blue sea dragons that are living in there.

Obviously the garbage has to get out of the ocean, I just remember that the last I heard about it a few years ago they had to stop because they were accidentally hurting and killing the very wildlife they're trying to protect. It's a shitty catch 22 we've created, but I hope they succeed. That garbage has been there too fucking long.

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

Nonprofit environmental organization the Ocean Cleanup has announced that it's on track to eliminate the Great Pacific Garbage Patch by 2034.

If it can get the necessary funds, that is. In a press release, the organization claimed that eliminating the patch once and for all would cost a whopping $7.5 billion

The title seems rather misleading. "We're on track if someone just gives us 7.5 billion USD" is a really big if. It doesn't seem like they are close to raising those kinds of funds either.