i always wonder if you include the older titles that just don't work anymore on modern windows but work fine on proton. i wonder what a windows user library percentage wouldn't be. I knows it would not be 100%. It seems they always forget those when windows users complain about Linux/proton compatability.
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
92 points (100.0% liked)
Steam Deck
591 readers
5 users here now
A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.
Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.
As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title
The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.
Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.
These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.
Rules:
- Follow the rules of Sopuli
- Posts must be related to the Steam Deck in an obvious way.
- No piracy, there are other communities for that.
- Discussion of emulators are allowed, but no discussion on how to illegally acquire ROMs.
- This is a place of civil discussion, no trolling.
- Have fun.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
That actually came up in some of the early ROG Ally reviews. Some reviewers found that old steam games wouldn't run on it, but they would run on the steam deck.
My hazardous guess would be that their average percentages are the same, but the era is where it would differ. Linux compatibility for newer titles is where Linux is lacking, but the support for older titles is pretty fully fledged.
Likewise, Microsofts compatibility with older titles is pretty abysmal but is probably comparable to compatibility with newer titles on Linux.
That said, over time I have a feeling MS will continue to go down and Linux will continue to go up.
It's a nice way of seeing which games can boot up, but using it as way to gauge if its a "great experience" is one I don't think is accurate.
I think this is a misconception many have. Somewhere in an intereview or an article Valve stated and explained the Verified program is not about how well a game runs on Steam Deck, but a checkmark of a few important points. Even if the game runs badly, it might be verified. The reasoning and greater idea is not how well it runs on this specific hardware, but compared to the Windows counterpart. Meaning if the game runs 20 fps on Windows, and it runs exactly the same on Linux with Proton, then it is verified. Now you can argue and disagree, that is fine. But I think that was the goal of Valve with this verification process.
Steam Deck verification includes things like text being legible and buttons showing up correctly in prompts and mapping, etc. For example, Civilization VI has a Linux native version but is not verified because some game text is too small, and it might require some typing using the virtual keyboard which may not pop up automatically when required.
I know, that is what I meant with "checkmark of a few important points". But the game can run horrible, due to bad optimization leading to bad performance in example. Lot of people think the performance is the verification process, but it isn't. I was talking about the misconception about performance factor.
That's because performance is a criteria for getting verified:
default configuration: the game must ship with a default configuration on Deck that results in a playable framerate.
Source: https://partner.steamgames.com/doc/steamdeck/compat#DeckCompatibilityChecklist
There is no "target framerate" though, so what's considered "playable" differs from tester to tester.
That's a good point.