this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
801 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

1357 readers
23 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] atro_city@fedia.io 47 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

While introducing opt-out tracking where you data is sent to advertisers. Get LibreWolf instead.

[โ€“] 30p87@feddit.org 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Or just set the few relevant settings manually, if you need nightly/dev edition.

[โ€“] atro_city@fedia.io 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Until the next dumb shit Mozilla does without telling its users.

[โ€“] 30p87@feddit.org 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Except I've heard about every change from here. And as I read the nightly changelogs, it's not that hidden actually.

[โ€“] atro_city@fedia.io 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, you're the exception, not the rule.

[โ€“] 30p87@feddit.org 6 points 5 months ago

The things I said apply to the people that need to use FF nightly/dev. And those people should know their stuff.

[โ€“] VarosBounska@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 months ago

Oh I didn't know this fork, thanks!

[โ€“] HauntedBucket@lemm.ee 37 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I am specifically waiting for this to happen so I can be part of the flood to Firefox when they finally throw the switch.

[โ€“] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

Why wait?

Also, Brave browser exists for those who are particularly attached to chromium.

[โ€“] HauntedBucket@lemm.ee 93 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm not touching brave with a 10 ft pole but thanks for your advertisement

[โ€“] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I'm just learning about what all the fuss around Brave is. But I'd be interested to hear how Google seems to be the ethical choice for a daily driver browser currently. It's obviously fine to not want to use Brave, but how is it the inferior choice when compared to Chrome (or even considered a sidegrade)? Even with all the issues mentioned I'd still recommend it as the lesser of the 2 evils compared to Chrome.

[โ€“] ivn@jlai.lu 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No one is saying Chrome is the ethical choice, why are you reducing this to a 2 options choice?

[โ€“] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

why are you reducing this to a 2 options choice?

I'm not.

No one is saying Chrome is the ethical choice

The commenter I'm replaying to implies they're using Chrome primarily, and then reacted negatively to the mention of Brave. I'm asking how Chrome use is the acceptable choice and Brave is seemingly so bad in comparison.

[โ€“] ivn@jlai.lu 7 points 5 months ago

I don't think the commenter you are replying to is arguing that chrome is a better choice. He or she knows it's bad but didn't make the change out of lazyness (no offence). Change has a cost, especially if it implies changing habits. So people will just delay or avoid them.

obviously, but when you have the option of just, not using chrome at all, why would you use anything chromium based to begin with, google is literally the problem here lmao

brave is literally just chromium, it solves none of the fundamental problems other than being like, reasonably well built.

It's chrome, but if it didnt't try and kill you ever update. That's the difference.

I could see this as part of a metrics thing - if Google sees a big drop in users right after the rollout, it's harder to brush it under the rug as having no correlation.

[โ€“] bluewing@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

Or perhaps try ungoogled chrome if you enjoy Chrome.

[โ€“] mrmanager@lemmy.today 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Still the best browser, even though the majority left it for the speed they think chrome has.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Mozilla's slowly creeping in the surveillance with adding integrated crap like Pocket and AI driven Fake Spot. I'm really glad Librewolf's made a privacy focused fork of their browser without all that nonsense.

[โ€“] menixator@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

Related announcement: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/privacy-preserving-attribution

TLDR: Mozilla wants your data and it's opt out. If you're on FF 128 it's already on and you will have to turn it off manually. Shame how they have fallen this low. The LEAST they could have done is show a pop up announcement when the user upgraded to 128.

Also: +1 to Librewolf. Mozilla is definitely going to try more scummy crap like this in the future. Definitely the better option over Firefox.

[โ€“] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I just read that whole article and it sounds like a good implementation? Companies want to know how effective their ads are, and I like their approach of trying to find a way to provide this without wholesale personal data collection. They even say at the end that they don't get the data either. It sounds like a reasonable thing to try and standardize.

[โ€“] menixator@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm not commenting on implementation itself but rather on how Mozilla went about with an opt-out approach into the collection program (even if it was for testing) to a community they have cultivated with the promise of privacy.

Collecting my data is a big deal. It doesn't matter how it is used. I should at least consent to it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Can't wait for ladybird to come out! Finally something that speaks our language.

[โ€“] greywolf0x1@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I think Servo is a better option, it's also being written in rust.

load more comments (4 replies)
[โ€“] threeduck@aussie.zone 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Damn, 2026. I hope you CAN wait.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Zacryon@feddit.org 4 points 5 months ago

I've read the announcement. Sounds reasonable and sufficiently private to me. So saying "Mozilla wants your data" sounds misleading and like an overreaction to me. Also might help to mitigate the arms race in privacy protection versus tracking for ads and worse stuff.

Mozilla is definitely going to try more scummy crap like this in the future.

How do you know that?

Even if, there will still be alternatives. But right now, Firefox is the best browser with regards to privacy and security. It even passed minmum ratings by the german IT security authority, contrary to other widely used browsers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] coolusername@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

a lot of sites are unusable with librewolf for some reason

[โ€“] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

A lot of sites? Or more like just a few? Personally, the ratio of working vs broken sites is like 100 to 1 and when a site is broken, its usually one of those shit pile SEO listicle sites or some absolute trash heap of ads. Every time I've disabled the protections I've regretted it.

A lot of the web is useless trash nowadays and Librewolf has done a good job of filtering that for me.

[โ€“] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Has it actually been confirmed when it's coming? I feel like this has been threatened for years now.

[โ€“] ivn@jlai.lu 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It started in june, for now it's just showing a warning saying that the extension will soon no longer be supported. They'll be disabled gradually until the beginning of 2025.

https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/develop/migrate/mv2-deprecation-timeline

[โ€“] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ah I see. Boiling the frog as it were.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Ascend910@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)
[โ€“] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I've been curious about Floorp. Are you using it as your daily driver? And pros and cons?

[โ€“] CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

The biggest pro for me is the vertical tabs. It's got the same vertical tabs that Edge has which are great. I only use Edge at work but it's great especially when you have a web based production environment like nCino that you work in all day and have dozens of tabs open. You can group them up nicely and keep yourself organized. Floorp is based off of Firefox ESR so it's on an older build (but up to date security). The current build is based off FF 115 while FF is on 129 now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Kay_Angel 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What does chromium-based browsers on pc have that Firefox doesn't have? Like I don't understand why people use Chrome instead of Firefox.

[โ€“] Baizey@feddit.dk 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

One thing for danish people is the "online government id" (MitID) everyone has and needs to use for online purchases and logins to banks and various other things.

It straight up only works on chrome for mobile :/

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] dev_null@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I like Vivaldi and they are going to keep V2 support for a while. I will switch to Firefox when it's gone, but for the time being I am happy they are keeping the support.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] mhzawadi@lemmy.horwood.cloud 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[โ€“] ivn@jlai.lu 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

That's not the same. DNS blocking is great but it can't block as well as a proper ad blocker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 points 5 months ago

How convenient that this happens just a few days after Firefox implements the features that have been blocking me from switching for the last few years.

Still, I'm curious about other browsers. We know Chrome is killing V2, but what about other Chromium-based browsers? I saw below a comment espousing Brave, but I'd rather use Chrome than Brave because of the gross crypto bs. What about Vivaldi, Opera, and Chredge? Will they keep supporting Manifest V2?

[โ€“] VarosBounska@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I do not study in detail if this combination is necessary, but:

  • Firefox (of course)
  • Ghostery
  • Ublock Origin
  • Privacy Badger
  • Decentraleyes
  • Disconnect
[โ€“] ivn@jlai.lu 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

All of them except uBlock Origin are in Arkenfox "Do not bother" extension list: https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/wiki/4.1-Extensions#-dont-bother

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 months ago

Ghostery, Privacy Badger and Disconnect do nothing worthwhile that uBlock Origin doesn't already do.

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] foreverandaday@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

Manifest v3 was why I switched to FF a while ago - it was going to only be a matter of time even with the delays so I figured I should switch early. I still like how chrome looks a lot more and wish we had tab grouping, but google can take uBO from my cold, dead hands.

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ