this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
21 points (100.0% liked)

Antiwork

328 readers
1 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My formerly amazing company just sent us this in an internal email. Unfortunately, too long to post here so I pastebin` it. Hopefully this is allowed.

My apologies if it's not.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zedd00@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 7 months ago

Ahh yes, the old "I can't get an erection unless I make my serfs' life miserable" policy adjustment.

[–] OsaErisXero@kbin.run 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That was a weird way to spell constructive termination.

I hope you file for unemployment from the date that takes effect.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 4 points 7 months ago

Exactly. This thing itself is saying most people live outside of reasonable range of an office. And it says nothing about any sort of accommodation for those people or ability to continue remote work. This is a 'relocate or quit' notice. For those who were hired as remote workers, I hope they are smart enough to just say no to both options, force the company to lay them off and pay unemployment and severance.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Sounds like a change of employer is in order.

[–] zer0squar3d@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 7 months ago

Really wish I didnt need to but this seals the deal. Time to update the resume.

Was a great company too, been here almost 3 years. 😢

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I personally believe that this is what some of these employers want, including my own. They want to reduce headcount without paying severance or unemployment.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

In many states, being forced back to the office after working from home for a long period allows you to collect unemployment if you quit on those grounds. Check your state's requirements. IIRC it has to be demonstrable to be a significant burden but it can count as constructive dismissal.

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 months ago

Unfortunately, most don't understand the system, don't know their rights, and won't pursue it.

[–] zer0squar3d@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

Is California one of them?

[–] onoira@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 7 months ago

Per the March All Hands discussion […]

i guess from experience that this was neither 'all hands' nor a 'dicussion'. it was 'whoever['s logged in before office hours| doesn't want to enjoy their lunch] gets to look at boomer memes and dull graphs for 2 hours while listening to the latest round of edicts graciously handed down by the Board.'

if you missed it, and you're lucky, they recorded it. if you're very lucky: you get an email with the slide deck and talking points for what could've just been an email to begin with.

[–] kayazere@feddit.nl 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You can also discuss adjusting your commuting times to minimize time spent on the road while still benefiting from being in the office with other employees.

Lol, how can commute times be reduced via a discussion?

[–] zer0squar3d@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

The same way "thoughts and prayers" works, I guess.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 1 points 7 months ago

Looks like someone ingested the managers HR handbook or delegated the task to chatgpt.

I'd be polishing my resume.