this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
356 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

40 readers
4 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lugh@futurology.today 104 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Good news for pigs. I'll be delighted to see factory farming disappear and be replaced by tech like this.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago (9 children)

Yeah but what are we gonna do with all these pigs then? Uplift them and invite them into our society?

[–] pufferfischerpulver@feddit.de 38 points 7 months ago

Slaughter them for one last time and spare their future generations by removing their lineage from existence. Nbd

[–] demosthememes@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

We could let the pigs run the farm, then document what happens.

[–] Templa 2 points 7 months ago

You could even write a book about that!

[–] viking@infosec.pub 8 points 7 months ago

Eat the last generation and put a couple in zoos, like we did with all species once they are no longer useful...

[–] lucas 7 points 7 months ago

This was definitely one of my concerns when I first went vegan, but thankfully, it's really not a problem at all, due to basic supply and demand.

Everyone in the world isn't going to go vegan overnight. The demand for animal products will gradually decline over decades, and farmers won't waste their time and money by raising more animals than they can sell, so the supply will decline in turn.

[–] GammaGames 6 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Release them into the wild

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 9 points 7 months ago

Nah. We got people in helicopters shooting them by the hundreds and they are still out of control.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

Imagine how that moment would look on The Simpsons. Imagine Lisa hitting the button to free them all

[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That’s the fastest way to kill of even more animals and species as a whole. Pigs are really good at adapting and eating.

[–] GammaGames 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah, it’s not a good idea

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago

Someone has been reading Revelation Space.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 47 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

Technically kosher because there's no cloven hooves?

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

As a technical Jew I can say that yes, this is technically kosher ^disclaimer: I have no knowledge at all of Jewish custom or scripture^

[–] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 25 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Their mother was Jewish but they haven't been taught the religion, making them technically Jewish but without any knowledge of Judaism.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

He’s a Jew but not Jewish.

Like me.

One is an ethnicity. The other is a religion. It’s easy to get them confused.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 21 points 7 months ago

He’s Jew-ish

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So is everybody here a technical Jew? Like, that's three of us, and this isn't a huge community.

[–] flathead@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm Brian, and so is my wife.

[–] Duranie@literature.cafe 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Brian is an interesting name for a woman. Then again, my brother Steven married a man named Stephen.

[–] flathead@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's from "Life of Brian", and somewhat related to Jewish identity. Here's the referenced scene - recommend the whole movie if you've never seen it.

https://yewtu.be/watch?v=4SYc_flMnMQ

Good for Steven and Stephen, and wish them every happiness.

[–] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 4 points 7 months ago

Ahhhhh this makes more sense, thanks for clarifying!

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

Bingo 👍👌

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

They’re not technically kosher. Nor halal.

NOT YET

It hasn’t officially been ruled upon by either kosher or halal certification boards yet (although many Jewish and Islamic leaders have expressed differing opinions on the matter), but most lab meat growers very much hope it will be ruled as what is known as “parvere” — or not meat. That is to say, since it didn’t actually come from an animal, it’s not technically meat, it has no blood, wasn’t slaughtered, etc., and, as such is considered more in line with a vegetable or other foodstuff that isn’t milk or meat.

If lab meat is considered in this way, it could clear the way for Kosher and Halal certification as well as for Hindus who do not eat beef, and many others with objections to eating meat for various reasons.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

kosher or halal certification boards

That's fucking wild.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

We live in a brave New World, adjudicated by a very old and blind one

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.de 5 points 8 months ago

Asking the real questions!

Yes, very Kosher.

source: porky the pig

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 35 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm skeptical. It's been really picking hard to get those things to grow in a vat. This would be a huge breakthrough, and popsci has a way of leaving out critical, fatal details.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Such as “a claim proven by the hundred pounds of pseudo pork they shipped us overnight”?

I didn’t read the article. I assume this journalist made zero primary observations?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] revisable677@feddit.de 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I've been waiting for that for so long. Just hope governments and people give it a fair chance instead of jumping rashly negative conclusions just because it is lab grown. So is beer, and cheese, and most other things we consume.

[–] tooLikeTheNope@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Italy's politicians in a fantastically backward and utterly brain farted move has made "synthetic meat" outlaw, for study, production, sale and consume, like already some months ago, just to please the local (read: national) farmers lobby. Or at least they adverised as they did... forgive me I kinda lost hope and interst as well.

Gotta love the totally-not-neofascist Meloni government :(

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 5 points 7 months ago

I mean, with modern sausages, it's mostly trash or overpriced. They taste like they have 5% meat, 95% sawdust.

[–] humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 7 months ago

Wait until pig cancer cells turn into sausages 90 times faster

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This stuff was basically ready to go minus scaling up two decades ago. They were still working on adding marbling and texture into steaks that could fool you in a blind test, but amazed it’s taken this long to get to sausages.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.de 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I think you got your timing wrong. The first prototype of cultured meat was presented 2013 and costed about 250.000 € back then. "Minus scaling up" was and is a pretty big issue.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultured_meat

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/aug/05/world-first-synthetic-hamburger-mouth-feel

[–] shiveyarbles 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm not exactly sure, but I think we can combine pork growing vats and AI to create a new species.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 6 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Uhh. That's meaningless? What's the energy/resource usage comparison.

[–] survivalmachine 3 points 7 months ago

Only meaningless on one scale. It seems like a huge improvement on the animal cruelty scale.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

I’d try to use money to calculate that. For farming, there’s probably tons of data. But for growing meat, there won’t be as good a model of what this thing’s inputs are. Like say it takes a dropperful of iodine at one point in the process. What’s the energy content of that iodine?

Money would be a good approximation of this: what’s the cost of producing that pork versus rearing a pig?

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

Eh it's not great but if they can create true pork competitive product quickly, that can be profitable in a chaotic market, allowing them to scale production to meet more unforseen/fast moving demand.

[–] Phoenix5869@futurology.today 4 points 7 months ago

So when can we realistically expect this to be a thing?

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

okay, but what's the resource consumption like? that's the major issue with meat farming - it takes all the resources necessary to grow food for the animals, and also all the resources necessary to keep and grow the animals themselves. If you need more meat in the same timeframe you can always just raise more pigs.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 months ago

Whatever that is right now, I'd say it's at least more animal friendly, and you can control waste and pollution better, making it cleaner.

Over time, efficiency can be improved as well

I'd say it's a very good step

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

I mean, theoretically this makes only the parts we want to eat and makes it directly instead of an offshoot of all the other biological processes like growing to the right age and ratio and growing the parts needed to keep it alive all that time. So my ass pull non educated thought process would assume the end result should require faaaaarrr less energy assumption for the same amount of meat?

load more comments
view more: next ›