this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
181 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

1357 readers
16 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] explodicle@local106.com 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't get it, who's saying people who support election reform shouldn't vote?

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 17 points 9 months ago (2 children)

We sure get a lot of “both sides bad” around here.

Hard not to be suspicious of their motives.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 14 points 9 months ago

How to drive voter turnout and create more sides so we’re not just left with two absolutely garbage choices every time:

Get rid of fucking first past the post. Ranked choice is by far more democratic, and some states have already implemented it to great success. Let’s go already, this needs to be the national standard.

[–] Jaytreeman@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Voting is the minimum. The reason there's no decent alternative is because people vote and think they did their part.

If you're voting for the lesser of two evils and that lesser is actively supporting genocide, but you're complaining about people that are saying 'both sides bad'...

'If you're curious what you would do to stand up against genocide, you're doing it now' - a braver man than me

[–] Tak@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

I assume you're talking about the US and the reason the US is always voting between the lesser of two evils is because it's a FPTP voting system as well as a lot of convoluted old systems that need to be updated. The ability to throw your vote away is a failure of a democratic system and why the US is an oligarchy because the people you can vote for are determined for you and not selected by you.

[–] OozingPositron@feddit.cl 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If someone tries to throw this at you, remember that it's an argumentative fallacy, it's called tu quoque.

[–] catacomb 1 points 8 months ago

Good to know the name, I've seen it invoked a few times.

In fact, I had this recently at work where I questioned a decision only for them to retort with one similar characteristic which a prior suggestion of mine shared. This was also a modal fallacy as they only used that one characteristic to come to a conclusion about both.

You also see it all of the time in politics unfortunately, a lot of "yeah but you also..." where we should be hearing good justifications.

[–] ULS@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Are the sticks supposed to be euphemism?