this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
58 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10182 readers
68 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.

Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
remington
alyaza
TheRtRevKaiser
Gaywallet
JuBe
JCPhoenix
kalanggam
circularfish
knokelmaat
58
Alabama condemned for nitrogen gas execution: ‘They intended to torture him’ (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 9 months ago by CaractacusPotts@lemmy.ca to c/politics
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Smith’s execution by “nitrogen hypoxia” took around 22 minutes, according to media witnesses, who were led into a viewing room at the William C Holman correctional facility in Atmore shortly before 8 pm local time.

top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Overzeetop 12 points 9 months ago

At this point, I think the only possible solution, aside from the obvious and cheaper life without parole, is to move to a pneumatically operated guillotine. We know that any post-separation convulsions are entirely disconnected from the brain. Sure, it's a little messy, but retribution and vengeance have their drawbacks. Just clean up the mess or stop executing people.

On a realistic note, I would not be surprised that holding his breath led to his "torture" with CO2 building up in his blood as he intentionally writhed and resulting in actual discomfort as the body reacted to the CO2 even as the lack of oxygen in the breathing mix caused him to lose consciousness. It's his final act to make a posthumous case (real or sensational) against his executioners. I find it hard to imagine that trace CO2, in even welding N2, would be sufficient to cause a reaction unless they intentionally got a gas mix (I don't weld with N2, but 75Ar/25CO2 is very common for MIG).

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 11 points 9 months ago (4 children)

It's so weird how many people are so against Nitrogen asphyxiation when it should be one of the easiest, cheapest, and safest methods.

How'd they manage to screw it up?? Unless they botched it on purpose to prove a point?

[–] xor@infosec.pub 19 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Dr. Kevorkian invented an actually humane way of executing people (not that execution is humane, but)
it has three drugs, one to knock you unconscious, one to stop the heart and one to stop breathing...
suffocation is not going to be humane...
even with pure nitrogen, we have the ability to render people unconscious first...
which is what they'd do if they weren't trying to torture people.

[–] jarfil 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Apparently they tried that on this guy first, but couldn't find a vein. Guess he did everything possible to make it hard to find one... and they didn't knock him out first, like with some laughing gas.

suffocation is not going to be humane... even with pure nitrogen

With pure nitrogen, unconsciousness comes first. Emphasis on the "pure" part; the moment any CO2 or O2 gets into the mix, shit happens.

[–] xor@infosec.pub 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

they definitely can find a vein... it's just not always easy...
as a kid they could never find my veins... even had an IV in my foot once. but when they need to they'll just keep trying and calling in backup (and eventually a specialist).

but yes of course, they could just use knock-out gas... and, really, completely replacing a rooms air with pure nitrogen is pretty dumb when you think about it. unless it was just a huge volume of gas that flooded the room. pulling a vaccuum on an entire room would take a while too.
and obviously he would hold his breath... eventually exhaling co^2
but yeah, why wouldn't they just use standard anesthesia gas? or nitrous oxide?
...
someone invented a concept-art nitrogen gas suicide booth in switzerland, and some bubba read a tweet about it and now we have this here crime against humanity...

[–] Smoke 5 points 9 months ago

but yeah, why wouldn’t they just use standard anesthesia gas? or nitrous oxide?

Because the suppliers don't want to be associated with executions, so they won't sell any to the state for that purpose.

[–] jarfil 3 points 9 months ago

It highly depends on the skill of the nurse, some have a sixth sense to do it at the first try. I have my veins destroyed thanks to long hospital stays while getting pumped full of antibiotics... but just today went to get some blood drawn, got the good nurse, and he did it on the first try. Actually barely felt it at all.

As for the Swiss guys, they have other non-art methods that can also use nitrogen... but they're all targeted at people willing to die, not trying to fight it.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

we have the ability to render people unconscious first…

The people who have that ability would rightly lose their license if they used that ability to facilitate an execution.

[–] xor@infosec.pub 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

i don't think it's "rightly"
although execution is barbaric and should be outlawed; if you can't stop it, making it more humane is still moral.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Disagree. It is not and cannot be moral to take any part in an execution.

[–] Swallowtail 4 points 9 months ago

I agree with you. Imagine a country starts rounding up and murdering some ethnic/religious minority. Doctors shouldn't be like "ahh we must help the government kill them in the most humane way possible!" If anything that's enabling it.

[–] Kornblumenratte@feddit.de 5 points 9 months ago

The only problem is that that's just the theory. There are lot of steps that can and will go wrong in practice and turn this method into torture. What is the rate of botched executions by injection? I don't know, but well above 0 %.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 12 points 9 months ago (3 children)

It’s so weird how many people are so against Nitrogen asphyxiation when it should be one of the easiest, cheapest, and safest methods.

There is inherently no safe way to kill someone and no method should be pursued regardless. Killing captive people is wrong.

[–] Ava 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's great, and there's nothing wrong with those of us who feel that the death penalty is immoral. But as long as we are still committing some executions, I'd at least rather we try not to torture people while we do it.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I’d at least rather we try not to torture people while we do it.

There is no way to accomplish that. Execution is inherently cruel and there is no non-tortuous way to carry it out.

[–] jarfil 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There are plenty of ways to die without suffering, the most popular one being a morphine overdose, used in plenty of hospices when they give a patient a button to self-medicate until they pass out/away.

People, even whole families, keep dying in their sleep from CO poisoning every winter all over the world... and there are several other ways, some more accidental, some less.

If they really wanted to kill without torturing, they would've done it.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

There are plenty of ways to die without suffering, the most popular one being a morphine overdose, used in plenty of hospices when they give a patient a button to self-medicate until they pass out/away.

Self medicate. The inherent difference is execution involves an unwilling participant.

People, even whole families, keep dying in their sleep from CO poisoning every winter all over the world…

Those people are not strapped down in prison.

If they really wanted to kill without torturing, they would’ve done it.

That isn't possible. The very act of execution is torture.

[–] Lowbird 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think you're right. If psychological torture is torture - and if things alont the lines of sleep deprivation, solitary confinement, and so on amount to such - then the psychological experience of being condemned to death, then while in prison fighting through appeal after appeal after appeal for years and being condemened again and again but still having that small sliver of hope, then finally (for those who aren't ruled innocent or insane somewhere in that process) being marched to your end, must be torture too. Compared to that, a few moments of pain at the very end seems so small as to be beside the point.

Any improvement is an improvement, but there keep on being these news stories about "aha, we have finally found the way to do this painlessly!" that repeatedly don't end up panning out for one reason or another. Even this relatively small improvement in the lot of death row convicts seems totally illusive.

[–] sqgl 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The very act of execution is torture.

That got me thinking: If euthanasia was legal, should prisoners be given the option? Or would that lead to them being mistreated to push them into euthanasia to save the taxpayer incarceration costs?

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If euthanasia was legal, should prisoners be given the option?

I have no idea how to square the inherent coercion of either capitalism or incarceration (or often both) affecting the choice but everyone has the right to end their own existence whenever they want.

[–] sqgl 1 points 9 months ago

If you look at #RoboDebt in Australia, it could be argued that the unemployed were hooked to death saying as it lead to several suicides.

[–] sqgl 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

TBH I am following the news on this because a cheap, legal and easy way out of I get dementia would be reassuring.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

TBH I am following the news on this because a cheap, legal and easy way out of I get dementia would be reassuring.

Legal is irrelevant if the method is successful. What are they gonna do, throw your corpse in prison?

Second, I wouldn't follow news on state murder to determine how to go out yourself but as a bit of free advice apparently they put just enough oxygen in those helium canisters consumers can buy to stop people doing what you're thinking that way.

[–] ohitsbreadley@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

...they put just enough oxygen in those helium canisters consumers can buy to stop people...

I'm not so sure that's true... At least, I know for certain it wasn't true for at least one brand of consumer grade helium canisters sold in the US, around 12 or 13 years ago.

In the early 2010s, I worked the day shift as an EMT for a small town ambulance company. One morning, right as I was clocking in for the 5am shift change, a call came in for an adult male unresponsive. My partner and I didn't think much of it - it was a college town and we worked the Friday morning shift, so it wasn't unusual to get early calls for drunk frat kids passed out in a yard from the Thirsty Thursday parties - don't get me wrong, these were often serious situations, but run of the mill stuff for the job. So we told the overnight volunteers to go home, jumped in the rig and got on our way to the scene.

I started to get a bad feeling on the way over though, because it was at the local fishing pier, which was in a park - kind of a scenic place, not really near the college - but my partner played it down, said rush week had just finished so it's probably some pledge bullshit or something.

We arrive at the park, pull into the parking lot, and see the police lights off to the right - the dock is off to the left, with a small beach to the right, with the parking lot overlooking the coast - the police officer has back against the trunk of a grey Nissan, thumbs in his vest, head hung low - looks up at the ambulance makes eye contact with me and shakes his head.

We get out of the rig, ask him what's going on, he tells us that we'll need to pronounce, and it isn't pretty.

I walk around the driver side of the car and see a kid in the front seat. He couldn't have been older than 20. There was a clear plastic bag over his head, the edges pulled taught to his neck with a length of string tied in a bow, the bag mostly inflated so it wasn't touching his face. There was one end of a tube inside the bag, held in place with an extra knot from the string. The other end traced back to a tank sitting on the front passenger seat, still in its cardboard box with pictures of happy children playing with balloons on the side. There was a bottle of brown liquor in the cupholder.

I'll never forget the blank stare of his semi-open eyes, set in his young, handsomely featured, yet now lifeless face - his skin the ashen, mottled, and pale blue-grey color of the recently deceased.

It was immediately obvious this young man had parked there for one last nice view of either a sunset or sunrise, drank up some courage, donned his gear, and drifted off to a final sleep.

I stood there only for a moment, but it felt like an eternity passed as I absorbed the emotional intensity of what had transpired there. I regained my sense of composure with the crack of my partner shattering the driver-door's window, saw him reach to check for a pulse, turning his head away after a moment while waiting for the full, painfully requisite 60 seconds, pronounced him dead, and we were back in the truck on our way back to the station.

I'm still not right from that call.

I really hope things have changed, and that manufacturers are required to add oxygen or bitter compounds or something that prevent this kind of thing from happening.

If you've read down this far, I thank you. Writing this out was helpful for me to process - I took a few minor liberties in writing this story, mostly to obfuscate potential recognition, and for dramatic effect - but made no changes to what I felt and saw in my description of that scene.

And lastly, if you're struggling with your mental health or substances - you're not alone. This world can be hard and cruel, terribly isolating and dark - but there is warmth and kindness too. If you feel like hurting yourself, please don't. You are loved. You will be missed by the ones who love you. If you're in crisis, and there's someone you know and trust, call them and talk to them. If they cant talk or don't pick up, or if there's no one you feel you can trust, call a crisis prevention hotline any time, any day, and they will listen to you with the utmost respect, dignity, and empathy.

[US and Canada] Call 988 for the suicide and crisis lifeline. Call 911 for life-threatening/imminent situations. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/suicide-prevention

[Most other countries] Call your local emergency line, most often it's 112 if you're outside of North America - they will direct you to help if you're in need.

Additional information: https://www.cnet.com/health/suicide-hotlines-crisis-hotlines-to-call-when-you-need-help/

[–] sqgl 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Haha, true. Nevertheless I meant legal as in easy to acquire the means.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I meant legal as in easy to acquire the means.

Do you live a place where that describes a gun?

[–] sqgl 1 points 9 months ago

No. Australia. But if you have a change of mind a split second before pulling the trigger you risk surviving with horrific injury.

My state of NSW last year legalized euthanasia so I suppose the means are accessible. I'm not going to care about expense if it ever gets to that.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

When I say safe, I mean to the ones administering. Obviously it's not so safe for the one dying.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

When I say safe, I mean to the ones administering.

Gas can leak out and kill people. Gas is also invisible.

Were administrator safety one's sole concern you got to think a blade to the throat beats out gas. As in Kashrut or Halal butchering.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This isn't a poisonous gas we're talking about. Air is 78% nitrogen.... A leak is of little concern unless it's somehow so large that it's displacing oxygen enough to cause oxygen deprivation.

A blade for throat-slitting feels like it'd be a larger danger to those administering, never mind the clean-up/biohazard concerns.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This isn’t a poisonous gas we’re talking about. Air is 78% nitrogen

Apparently it's deadly enough to kill at least 1 guy. You also can't see it.

I would say the risk of a gas spreading and affecting more than an intended target is greater than the risk someone will accidentally stab themselves in the head.

You raise a good point about fluids, but I think the danger from that can be mitigated with protective clothing to a greater degree than the next safest (for the administrator) option of a bullet can have its inherent danger of exploding at or near the wrong place be mitigated.

[–] Lowbird 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Idk that I agree with Nitrogen leaks being a big concern - I don't know enough for certain to say one way or another really - but supposing they are a risk, regardless I think the biggest risk to the executioners or viewers is the psychological one.

Even convulsions after death that truly aren't experienced by the convict can still greatly disturb the people who see them. Plus, in general, the psychological toll of systematically killing people who can't fight back as one's 'mundane' job. It's gotta fuck people up. Maybe along the lines of how drone pilots - who effectively go to war, but who aren't surrounded by fellow soldiers all the time like regular soldiers, but instead who go home every to friends and family who aren't at war, causing prolonged feelings of alienation and separation that tend to hit regular soldiers only after they come home from deployment - end up with a lot of ptsd problems.

[–] jarfil 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

How'd they manage to screw it up??

Ways that come to mind:

  • Guy held his breath for as long as possible, while fighting the restraints
  • Leaky mask that let in ambient air with oxygen, prolonging the agony
  • Cheap welding nitrogen laced with CO2, increasing the sensation of suffocation

Just like with suicide, there are plenty of tiny ways to botch an execution.

The article also mentions seizures, but that part is to be expected with any form of extensive brain damage leading to death... it can only be masked with some muscle relaxants, not avoided.

[–] sqgl 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The article also mentions seizures, but that part is to be expected with any form of extensive brain damage leading to death..

Is this precisely because it wasn't pure nitrogen?

[–] jarfil 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Nah, as the brain dies, it gets "damaged", and that can lead to seizures or whatever. It doesn't really matter why it's dying; as long as it stays more or less together, there will be "abnormal activity" until it runs out of energy and the neurons finally depolarize. During "natural death", the whole body is usually too weak, or too sedated, to show any sign of that, but in otherwise able-bodied individuals... death ain't pretty.

[–] sqgl 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Then the question is whether the seizures would wake one from a nitrogen knockout. ie would one be aware of the seizures?

[–] jarfil 1 points 9 months ago

Based on my limited experience with seizures, the oncoming of one can wake one up, but after that they seem to knock one out... so if one was already knocked out in advance, I don't think they would wake them up?

[–] Kornblumenratte@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago

Did they screw it up? Hypoxia causes convulsions, that's a well known fact, so I don't get all the fuss about witnessing normal body functions in a dying body. Especially as people convulsing are unconscious.

The real torture here – and with all death sentences – is the years and decades long psychological torture while on death row. And rspecially in this case of course the first, botched execution attemped. Ramming needles for four hours into someone!

[–] rwhitisissle 6 points 9 months ago

Absolutely horrific. This man committed a terrible crime and murdered an innocent woman, but the world gains nothing from the state murdering him.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 9 months ago

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summarySmith’s execution by “nitrogen hypoxia” took around 22 minutes, according to media witnesses, who were led into a viewing room at the William C Holman correctional facility in Atmore shortly before 8 pm local time.

He used sign language to say “I love you” to witnesses in the viewing room, and in his final statement he said: “Tonight, Alabama caused humanity to take a step backward.”

Volker Turk, the UN high commissioner for Human Rights, said on Friday: “I deeply regret the execution of Kenneth Eugene Smith in Alabama despite serious concerns this novel and untested method of suffocation by nitrogen gas may amount to torture, or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.”

“According to leading experts, this method is a particularly cruel and unusual punishment, in addition to the fact that the inmate was already subjected to a failed execution attempt in November 2022,” it said in a statement.

Bryan Stevenson, a well-known lawyer who has fought against the death penalty and founded the non-profit Equal Justice Initiative, also condemned Smith’s execution.

Kay Ivey, Alabama’s Republican governor, said the execution was “lawfully carried out by nitrogen hypoxia, the method previously requested by Mr Smith as an alternative to lethal injection”.

Saved 81% of original text.