this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
54 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10175 readers
10 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Notably ironic as he was speaking in support of an amendment to ban inclusivity training requirements for military members.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] peanuts4life 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fuck Republicans, but just for a sanity check, is it normal to say "people of color?" As in, "The judicial system is biased against people of color." That's in my verbal lexicon, and I'm suddenly questioning it.

Slurs are so interesting, being on a broad shifting scale based on contextual usage. I think it's interesting, for example, that "handicapped" has become a slur in my lifetime through it's general misuse.

[–] Raeyin 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, "people of color" is considered respectful.

And you're right, language can change pretty fast. I've seen plenty of respectful words become slurs. I've even seen slurs be reclaimed by communities. Don't even get me started on person-first vs identity-first language.

[–] argv_minus_one 7 points 1 year ago

“Black people” is not a slur, but “blacks” is. So is “negro people”, even though “negro” literally means “black”.

Bigots ruin everything, including language.

[–] Malgas 4 points 1 year ago

think it’s interesting, for example, that “handicapped” has become a slur in my lifetime

Hell, my mom used to work for an organization called ARC. When I was little it stood for "Association for Retarded Citizens". The organization still exists, but stopped being an acronym in the '90s.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But they're totally not racist, and definitely don't want to bring back Jim Crow

[–] TerryTPlatypus 1 points 1 year ago

Don't make me summon my ancestors back from the graves to beat some sense into their behinds.

[–] t3rmit3 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"But that's what the 'CP' in NAACP means!" <- white people who have never actually known a black person socially.

[–] Raeyin 3 points 1 year ago

Knowing someone socially doesn't always equate with showing respect.

[–] aka_oscar 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why is that a bad argument? If an organization has it in its name, surely its at least understandable someone might call them as such by accident.

[–] VoxAdActa 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a fine argument for people who grew up during a time when "colored people" was the less racist way of referring to POC.

Like, maybe this guy's great-grandfather, seeing as the NAACP was named in 1909.

But, to be a bit more charitable, his grandfather probably used the term (it peaked in usage in the 1960s), and maybe his father, if his father was one of those people who stubbornly resists change. But Rep Crane himself was born a decade after "colored" had gone from the least racist term to a decidedly mid-level racist term (after social shaming began to be applied to the more racist ones).

[–] aka_oscar 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah, I see. I wasnt aware said org had over a 100 years of existence. Some comments here gave me the impression that this term was ok a short time ago but if we're talking about multiple decades then this sounds like a mayor fuck up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] circularfish 9 points 1 year ago

They don't even try to hide it anymore.

[–] Mutoid 9 points 1 year ago

"Oh, my lucky stars, a Negro!" --this guy, probably

[–] Thedogspaw@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

How the hell can you be this clueless in 2023