this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
84 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

43 readers
7 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 23 points 1 year ago
[–] MelodiousFunk@startrek.website 17 points 1 year ago
[–] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 12 points 1 year ago

This is why all the politicians pushed so hard to get everyone back to work in London too. Scumbags!

[–] I1l0o0l1I 11 points 1 year ago

Convert to affordable housing.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago

Keep in mind that's not a bad thing. Owners of the properties lose, people who might use the properties for other things (a much larger group) win.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm cool with that... But when the fuck did we start taking anything McKinsey says at face value?

Those fuckers couldn't forecast the future of the question was"what do you want for lunch this afternoon". Those dipshits thought what Rikers needed was more violent guards.

They're saying this because some CEOs want to hear it

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago