this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
84 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

40 readers
3 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 23 points 11 months ago
[–] MelodiousFunk@startrek.website 17 points 11 months ago
[–] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 12 points 11 months ago

This is why all the politicians pushed so hard to get everyone back to work in London too. Scumbags!

[–] I1l0o0l1I 11 points 11 months ago

Convert to affordable housing.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 11 months ago

Keep in mind that's not a bad thing. Owners of the properties lose, people who might use the properties for other things (a much larger group) win.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'm cool with that... But when the fuck did we start taking anything McKinsey says at face value?

Those fuckers couldn't forecast the future of the question was"what do you want for lunch this afternoon". Those dipshits thought what Rikers needed was more violent guards.

They're saying this because some CEOs want to hear it

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago