this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

1454 readers
59 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When they try minor defendants in the USA as "adults," aren't they saying the kids aren't what the seem to be, that they aren't actually their chronological age? "Young at heart," an "old soul," saying the same thing.

Maybe we should respect someone who says they're old enough to be free of parental guardianship, or an adult child who isn't 26 in their self-view and shouldn't be kicked off their parents insurance.

Lots of possibilities here

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The words you're looking for are "immature" and "mature".

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I'm talking a legally binding claim. I am the age I say I am.

[–] Xoriff@lemmy.ml 14 points 11 months ago

Ehhhh careful. That line of thinking could easily turn into "I am the age that I say I am and I don't care that you think Gary is a creepy pedo. My body is 8 years old but I feel like a 40 year old and Gary understands that!"

To your point. Age shouldn't matter beyond that one transition from "legal guardian protects you while your brain finishes development" and "you are now legally an adult and in control (and responsible for) your own actions".

I think this is why the US legal system actually gets this one pretty close to right.

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 9 points 11 months ago

Please don't draw parallels between this self-serving nonsense and trans identities.

You haven't linked the CNN article you mention so it's difficult to respond to your post, even after mentally stripping it of nonsense.

We tend to end up with defined ages for eg driving, consent, criminal responsibility, etc because it is difficult to use more nuanced criteria. In practice, the law does (or can) take nuance into account (except for things like being able to have a driving licence or legally buy alcohol). Sometimes that is for good, humanitarian reasons (eg an adult with learning difficulties who cannot comprehend the consequences of their actions) or for misguided, vengeful reasons (eg trying a child as an adult because of the severity of their crime), or just plain prejudice (eg treating Black and/or poor children as greater threats than white, middle-class children).

There's no easy way to draw lines, and no easy way to allow nuance while excluding prejudice. But "whatever the accused decides is convenient for them, personally, right now" is never going to be a criteria, for obvious reasons.

[–] fhek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 11 months ago
[–] SHamblingSHapes@lemmy.one 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What is age confusion? And at what age can one expect to think that murdering multiple children and adults is ok?

So far I've gone from baby all the way to middle age without ever thinking I should murder multiple people. I would even go so far as to say the vast majority of people make it through all ages without murdering.

[–] kirklennon@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

When they try minor defendants in the USA as “adults,” aren’t they saying the kids aren’t what the seem to be, that they aren’t actually their chronological age? “Young at heart,” an “old soul,” saying the same thing.

The problem here is trying minors (disproportionately minority minors) “as adults.” The notion is absurd. We have a separate juvenile justice system for a reason. No, we shouldn’t start trying adults as children; we should stop trying children as adults.