this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
374 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

789 readers
4 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Most servers are not able to access the Google API.

Invidious report of the same(ish) problem: https://github.com/iv-org/invidious/issues/4045#issuecomment-1674373088

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone 141 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Not to be a downer but... how did people not anticipate this happening? Google is likely going to do everything they can to shut down non-official clients like Piped, since they're sidestepping all of YouTube's revenue streams. Hopefully they don't take the nuclear option and somehow lock down the API and make it much harder to download videos via tools like yt-dlp.

[–] negativenull@lemm.ee 52 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure most people anticipated it at some point. I just seems to be starting now.

[–] pufferfischerpulver@feddit.de 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'm not going to be popular saying this but how is the service supposed to survive without a revenue stream? It takes a shit ton of bandwidth and storage to keep YouTube running, that ain't free.

I get that the ads are incredibly annoying but if you truly watch as much YouTube as some people in this thread are claiming, maybe it's worth paying for it? I bit the bullet and for basically the price of my cancelled Spotify subscription I now have no ads in YT and an okay streaming service with yt music.

Of course Google could do things better. And actually I think it would be important to have a competitor. But I wouldn't expect that one to be free either.

[–] ReversalHatchery 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is c/privacy. Are you really advocating for pouring money on the company (Google) that's doing everything it can to get to know everyone and use the information for showing deceiving ads, among other things? Or the company that supports false political propaganda? (In the form of paid advertisements). Support your creators, thats a very good thing, but for the love of god please do not fund this data mining machine.

[–] pufferfischerpulver@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I really am! If they don't get money, and they don't get data, and they (obviously) don't get donations, how are they supposed to run the service? Out of the goodness of their hearts?

[–] ReversalHatchery 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They get enough money already. They are even spending on military tech research (google ventures), lobbying, and of course on their investors who have an unfulfillable hunger for money.

YouTube should be public infrastructure.

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Yeah we're basically hurting their revenue by using Piped and other ways to bypass Google's ads. They wouldn't be profitable if everyone stopped watching those ads

[–] Xylight@lemmy.xylight.dev 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Noooooooooo! The poor google 😢

their $412,378/s has been reduced to $412,367/s! 😭 😭

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Yeah, they should provide thousands of gigiabits of video streaming to everyone for free. It's our right!

[–] lemmy@lemmy.stonansh.org 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not for free. They use your data. Also most of these 'free' videos are made by enthusiasts.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Enthusiasts who want to earn money off the platform, yes.

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes, because humans never want to share information, or show others something they've achieved or created. The only possible motivation could be money.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not what I'm saying, but these people choose to upload their content to YouTube specifically, so what's your point?

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's there's not really another platform to upload to that you can easily share long form video content on, for free? I don't understand your point now.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My point is that nothing is free. You can't have it both ways.

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

What? My initial point was people wanted to share things like information or creativity and youtube is one of the only viable places to upload too. I literally don't understand your points.

[–] iegod@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

As a contributor who doesn't monetize videos, you don't speak for everyone.

[–] monk@lemmy.unboiled.info 16 points 1 year ago

Big platforms tend to forget they're big because they're free. It's our duty to remind them.

[–] Durotar@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

I wish the product was somewhat good too. Piped has features that even YT Premium users don't have.

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

They print money, sorry i lost my pity for multi billion dollar internet giants.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BrioxorMorbide@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

Well, if they implement their web integrity DRM thingy in Chrome and Youtube then that will prevent anything that's not a real approved browser from accessing the website, and with that the video streams. Not only Piped/Newpipe, but anything automated trying to access any website will be automatically locked out unless the website approves of it. New search engine bot? Archiving crawlers? Any type of third party program that accesses some website's content without approval? Dead.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It amazes me how entitled these Internet hippies are nowadays. You can't expect someone to provide such a huge service for free. If you don't like ads, pay for it. It's like $5 per month when you pay as a group..

[–] Tunawithshoes@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago

I would pay if

  1. Google promised not collect any data but now you would pay and have your data collected.

  2. I just want load my subscription feed and they are all there not hidden away.

  3. Hid shorts or have them on separate tab.

  4. Bonus would be if related videos where acutely related videos in time span. Not the mess they are now.

Also why would I have to pay YouTube music? I don’t want that.

[–] snor10@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

I would pay if they let me without compromising my anonymity.

[–] wifepimp4smokes@reddthat.com 12 points 1 year ago

They make enough money off the rubes. They should just let us nerds have this one.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd rather Youtube and Google itself be split up under anti-trust laws. I don't want them to exist.

I'd rather people build smaller video websites for niche subjects so the internet is decentralized to the extent it was when it first started.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nobody is forcing you to use their services.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actually they are, because Google controls 90% of the internet, most cell phones while Apple controls the rest and does the same, meaning we consumers don't get a choice.

We're just slaves.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google controls 90% of the internet

Google doesn't control shit, and you're referring to the web, not the internet. Nobody forces you to use YouTube, Maps or their search engine. The websites you visit choose to incorporate Google analytics and ads, which you can easily block if you feel enslaved in that sense.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most people's phones actually do, especially iPhone users, so that's not true.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So don't buy a fucking iPhone or a Google Pixel or whatever, it's your choice.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Meaning now I cannot use any phone and am now locked out of the modern age.

Your refusal to admit a problem does not remove that problem.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are plenty of options for running Android distributions free of Google influence.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Keep trying to avoid admitting the truth all you want to, you're still wrong about this.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wrong about what? I'm stating facts and you're crying about being forced to use products by big companies, which is entirely incorrect.

You're missing the greater point, and that's the problem. Think about what we're all trying to tell you for five minutes.

load more comments (2 replies)