brihuang95

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

huh, interesting. so from a security perspective is there any other concern with this protocol? at least they're not using a mac relay server like Nothing Chats was

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

what the hell?! really hoping those kids pull through, this is fucked

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 5 points 10 months ago

people should write in their diaries more often

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 48 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Here's why:

People are fucking stupid.

 

Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn't "some sketchy cryptocurrency" linked to an "exit scam." A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is "blockchain in a very pure form," and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who's claiming it.

Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient's public key -- a long string of letters and numbers -- which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. "Maybe it's the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I'm somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key," he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a "man-in-the-middle attack," like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.

Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can't be altered. Yen realized that putting users' public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them -- and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. "In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging," Yen said.

Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don't think I'm going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago

Oh they did, they took away my N64 and PS2 privileges

 
 
[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 5 points 10 months ago

Same here, no issues

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago (11 children)

This is a feature that Session had right?

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

https://www.privacytools.io/

another link to help you find some more privacy-focused alternatives. i think a great gmail, google calendar, and drive replacement is proton.me . I switched to them from google and haven't looked back

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 7 points 11 months ago

"make sure you file a claim after paying your medical bills!!"

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

anyone know why gyms can afford to be so sketchy with their cancellation process? it borderline sounds illegal, but since so many do this i can't help but wonder why there isn't any regulation around this sort of practice

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 months ago

wow, the balls of the folk who came up with this 🤡

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Just an average day I guess? They might be used to it at this point but I'd be curious to see if cancer rates are rising in Beijing and if there is any data pointing towards smog as a direct cause

 

Was curious if there were FOSS solutions since I really would like to avoid using anything Google related

 

According to its current privacy policy, with an account, Hue gets access to the configuration of your system to provide the right software updates to the devices. It can only use your data for marketing or share it with third parties if you provide additional consent.

However, in a change to the current policy, Yianni says Hue will not collect usage information from users without additional optional consent. “So, we do not require users share anything about how they use our products,” he says.

“Previously creating an account was consent for usage data processing that we are in the process of decoupling and will be decoupled before accounts become essential — that makes sure it’s possible to create an account without sharing usage data,” says Yianni. However, if you choose to use the cloud services for things like out-of-home connectivity, you will need an account, and Hue will process your data, he says.

If this change to the privacy policy does happen, Home Assistant’s Schoutsen agrees that it would make the requirement for an account more palatable. “But it all depends on the exact changes,” he says.

 

Oh boy, more enshittification

 

well i may have to consider picking this up.

view more: next ›