this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
238 points (100.0% liked)

Science

375 readers
1 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kalipike@lemmy.one 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Jeez what a title. I bet most folks read the title and assume it means better for health reasons not environmental reasons.

[–] Shikadi 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It says environmental in the title?

[–] kalipike@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, but at the very end, and humans are unfortunately known to only half-dead titles and then run with it haha.

[–] darq@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Good thing both of those conclusions are true.

[–] NightAuthor 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I’m pretty sure I read a meta analysis that concluded that a little meat is better than no meat. But that hardly matters bc when you tell someone about paleo they end up shoveling chicken, beef, and dairy down their throat with little to no vegetables and fruits (I think from the same analysis)