this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
120 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30570 readers
42 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Larian has delayed the release of Baldur’s Gate 3, currently on pace to possibly be 2023’s Game of the Year, until they can figure out how to make split-screen work on Series S.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] twistedtxb@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No Series S owner will be mad if a game has Series X specific exclusive content. MS is shooting itself in the foot

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago (13 children)

I think people would be mad. Imagine you play a game at your friend's home on his Series X, and then proceed to buy the game so you can play multiplayer online, only to then have a certain features or game modes missing (say you get team death match but not battle royale because it uses too much memory).

It's not that easy to communicate feature disparity. Some people probably don't even know which Xbox they have.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Problem is that it can turn into a slippery slope. Where should MS draw the line if they start to allow Series X exclusive content? Can developers cut entire game modes from the S version if they just ask kindly enough? Or maybe ignore the S version completely? The risk is that developers are going to abuse this opportunity.

MS wants people to see the Series S as a viable purchase. Why should you buy it when you won’t be able to play the next big release in full?

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, they should be able to say "this game doesn't run on series S" because it's significantly worse than the other options and it doesn't deserve the work it takes. It doesn't even have CPU parity, which is a much bigger deal than less GPU cores.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That will just betray all the customers who bought Series S. Will they upgrade to a Series X to play the next big thing? No, they will probably just buy a PS5 instead. Why should they continue to stay loyal with MS?

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

It's not capable.

They might have made the bed and be stuck in it, but it was a bad plan that substantially sabatoges the actual next gen console.

[–] red@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

It was a stupid promise and even worse requirement for publishing a game on the platform.

They should start considering them just different consoles and remove the parity (and requirement to release on both).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nathris@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If a game can't run on the Series S it means it also can't be ported to the PC. Turn down the resolution and graphics settings until you get the same fps target and continue in with your day.

I would expect any game from a developer that complains about this to be so poorly optimized that it runs like it would on the Series S on the bigger consoles, and likely have garbage gameplay as well because they spent all of their budget on graphics.

[–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, but game they’re talking about here, Baldur’s Gate 3, runs just fine on PC. But they can’t get a specific feature to run on Series S that can run on X. You might want to read the article before commenting?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snowbell 7 points 1 year ago

What. None of this comment makes any sense.