this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
142 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7498 readers
4 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Personal background: I strongly feel just about everyone grows up and has something shitty about them. I know growing up I definitely thought and said some less-than-ideal jokes about women, minorities, etc. And while some of that was the proverbial 'the times', and some was growing up in a sheltered hyper Christian southern American conservative situation, I regret my actions and am happy I grew past that. And I do think people, especially younger, can grow past their shittiness, especially with the help of others, which was true for me too... When I got my first W2 job a superior I looked up to helped mold me into a better person by calling me out on things and modeling a better behavior.

Current situation: I'm now the supervisor position, have been for a decade (retail is a trap) and I've taken that to heart, calling out jokes that aren't funny, etc. But recently we hired a new kid who acts really incel-ish, and who apparently has attached himself to me instantly. I've had moderate success so far just telling him his 'lol women dumb' jokes aren't funny, and modeling how working with women is... normal? Anyways, I don't wanna screw this up so do y'all have any suggestions for me to help keep him from going down an unfortunate path? I know at the end of the day I'm not responsible for others' routes in life, but I feel we should all do our parts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KasanMoor 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Huh, that's an interesting route to take. I worry it'll become too similar to the trap of "pink isn't a girl's color, it's actually a boy's color and they switched in the XX'th century and it's the color of blood so it's manly" that I've seen a lot of people fall into (kicking myself because I was one of them). It's not a bad step to be in, in that it helps normalize normally "feminine" actions/dress/etc. as things men can wear, but it's also just... still gendered unnecessarily?

To be clear, I haven't watched it yet and still intend to, I just worry about that from your description of it.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Yeah one of the big things that helped me snap out was male role models teaching me that all of that masculinity crap doesn't matter. The BEST phrase I heard was when someone said something stupid like "real men don't like Taylor Swift" my mentor responded "Real men don't care". That stuck with me.

Having a man I look up to tell me that real men do whatever they like and don't let others dictate what they can or can't so succinctly was just a game changer. No one had worded it like that to me. Real men don't care.

[–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

real men do whatever they like and don’t let others dictate what they can or can’t

this might not be a good message to deliver to a member of a group so prolific in the mass-shooting community that they have a wikipedia article dedicated to that fact

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Out of context there, he was just so casual and chill about it. It was more "they don't care if other people are judging them" and they shouldn't, no one should. Of course the subtext applies that "as long as you aren't hurting anyone else".

[–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

i would raise a very similar point about understanding nuance

[–] BarryZuckerkorn 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I try to avoid directly saying the phrase "toxic masculinity" because some have incorrect preconceived notions about what that means, and it often invites a tangent into that side discussion, but I like to still reinforce the core idea there: that society expects men to be a certain way, including by enforcing norms of telling men what they're not allowed to do or be. Gatekeeping what "real men" are and what manhood means is itself toxic, and has done lots of harm to men. And by explaining these concepts to men, and focusing the discussion on how these outdated gender norms are harmful and dangerous to men can help open up the dialogue about how gender norms are also harmful to women, too. And about how men who have been forcing themselves to fit a particular vision of manhood are also harmful to those around them (regardless of gender), as it affects their relationships with others, and their ability to regulate emotions.

oh for sure, you can't tell them they're being toxic, they'll take that as a badge of pride. Personally that's probably why that statement hit me so hard, it wasn't anything that I could latch onto to say "Well that's just some feminist idea" or some other BS, it was just a man that I looked up to, so casual, just brushing it off. He didn't even care about it. It just blew my entire worldview up. and not in the "Whatever man fuck society way" but in a "eh they can judge if they want, I don't care".

[–] Rentlar 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah that's the kind of thing Beau is good at. I didn't want to spoil too much of the video and kept the summary to two sentences, but that's one of the points where Beau challenges the viewer with something unexpected, that gets them to open their mind up and think a little, even if for just a moment.

[–] jarfil 11 points 1 year ago

Just watched that Beau's video, and it's pretty good, in a non-preachy way. He only puts up some generic examples of what women were sold on in the 18th century, and how men are being sold on the same kind of stuff in the 21st century, to end with the real truth: anyone telling you how to be a man/woman, is just trying to sell you stuff. Plus a call to think by yourself.

pink isn't a girl's color, it's actually a boy's color

Related to that, I like the history of high heels: from something strictly practical, to a gender-neutral status symbol of non-working classes, to a patriarchal monarchy status symbol, back to a general status symbol with an extra twist of marking women as unable to do any work, to a sexualizing split into an extremely unpractical version for women and a practical looking version for men, with a late addition of a much more practical version for women while still retaining some of the sexualization... all the time being bad for the wearer's health, with much healthier modern alternatives for the strictly practical uses.