this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
312 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10175 readers
10 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Senator Dianne Feinstein appeared confused during a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on Thursday. When asked to vote on a proposal, Feinstein began giving a lengthy speech instead of simply saying "aye" or "nay" as requested. The committee chair, Senator Patty Murray, had to repeatedly tell Feinstein "just say aye" and remind her that it was time for a vote, not speeches. After some delay, Feinstein finally cast her vote. A spokesperson said Feinstein was preoccupied and did not realize a vote had been called. The incident raises further concerns about Feinstein's ability to serve at age 90, as she has made other recent mistakes and often relies on aides.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Muffi@programming.dev 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Let's add some babies and teenagers while we're at it. I don't see them represented.

[–] argv_minus_one 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Babies and teenagers are represented by their parents…at least in theory.

[–] HumbertTetere@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Old people can just be considered represented by their adult children then.

[–] argv_minus_one 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it's not a great theory. Plenty of kids have bad/absent/dead parents. Plenty of old people have neglectful/nonexistent children.

[–] GentlemanLoser@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have no problem with lowering the voting age to 16.

If they're allowed to work, they should be allowed to vote.

But they can't be a senator until they are almost twice that.