this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
232 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

1454 readers
37 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What can we do to keep the web open?

@asklemmy

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Could you maybe still go back and find those links? I use FF for well over 10 years now. And I would say, the amount of websites that do not work, are less than one a year. The only reason are really bleeding edge css filter or MediaDevice instantiations (Webcam, etc.). Video, JS, and HTML is nearly Browser agnostic by this time. I would love to see those non working firefox websites everybody always talks about.

[–] tetraodon@feddit.it 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] ahto@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

FWIW it works fine in Firefox if you change the user agent.

[–] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They actively prohibit to use their website with FF. When I look at it in Chromium (only Chrome and Chromium are allowed. No Edge, No Safari, ...) I can not see anything why it should not work. Drag and Drop an Image into a dropzone.js container is no crazy technology. Imgur does it every day.

Do you know why they think it would not work in FF? It is just a translation service. I think this is not a good example, as it more seems like they do not want to support webkit and optimized it only for chrome, but their product does not seems to crazy for FF.

They also have Google Drive files connections. Maybe they have just bundled their product the the google ecosystem and therefore prohibit FF/Safari/etc. But this is not the problem of FF/Safari/etc., they just decided to offer a google product only on google browser.

(I would not support such a vendor lock-in, but that is just my 2 cents)

[–] tetraodon@feddit.it 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I 💯 agree and I don't like it either (I use Firefox as my daily driver). However I occasionally work as a translator and the competing CATs are inferior. So I have installed Chromium just for this one website.

[–] ampdrool@waveform.social 2 points 1 year ago

I was an early adopter to Matecat but I stopped using it to be fair… what do you like so much about it? I’m using OmegaT and DeepL for MT atm

[–] worfamerryman 1 points 1 year ago

The second one that recommended chrome, I honestly can’t even really remember what it was.

The local government one is local to just a few city blocks, so I’m not going to share it. But the only thing that didn’t work was when I input my city for example, the next box to select the street did not activate. When I clicked on it no streets were listed. Just a single empty box appeared.

When I did it in chrome I listed my city and then the next box populated with the streets.

I’m not sure if this makes sense, I’m from but not in the US and I’m trying to write about it in a way that makes sense.