this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
278 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37726 readers
51 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Apple has deployed a system called Private Access Tokens that allows web servers to verify if a device is legitimate before granting access. This works by having the browser request a signed token from Apple proving the device is approved. While this currently has limited impact due to Safari's market share, there are concerns that attestation systems restrict competition, user control, and innovation by only approving certain devices and software. Attestation could lead to approved providers tightening rules over time, blocking modified operating systems and browsers. While proponents argue for holdbacks to limit blocking, business pressures may make that infeasible and Google's existing attestation does not do holdbacks. Fundamentally, attestation is seen as anti-competitive by potentially blocking competition between browsers and operating systems on the web.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 199 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"Sorry, your device appears to be running Linux, please only use approved Apple or Windows devices to log in, with our required surveillance system pro installed. Thanks."

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 year ago

Unfair. Google, Amazon and Facebook devices will also be allowed.

[–] aperson 20 points 1 year ago

Should you chose not to continue, you agree to kick yourself in the balls.

[–] peter@feddit.uk 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Companies can already do that

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, but so far you can just spoof your user agent. Not sure how easy cracking private access tokens will be. I assume they'll be pretty proactive about keeping it locked down.

[–] Fed@lemdro.id 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

That's easily detectable. Try beating Google Safety Net that way.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Again, not an expert on Private Access Tokens, but I assumed the entire point is that it's a proprietary black box piece of hardware that's authenticating your device. If it's just passing a token generated in software, it would be trivial to bypass even without a VM.

Could you explain to me better what the VM would accomplish in this situation?

[–] TheOakTree 2 points 1 year ago

...do you really think the devs of these systems don't understand how to distinguish VMs from authentic devices in their device authenticating platform?

[–] gigachad@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Google already does that with Android and SafetyNet

[–] DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

"Can" and "have a reason" are different things. With attestation they actually have a reason.