Science

13079 readers

1 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Space

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

remington

alyaza

Gaywallet

60,000 People Died from Blistering European Heat Waves, New Analysis Finds (www.scientificamerican.com)

submitted 2 years ago by RickRussell_CA to c/science

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Excerpt:

More than 61,000 people died because of Europe’s record-shattering heat wave last summer, scientists have concluded. And that’s probably still an underestimation.

The figure is just shy of the 70,000 excess deaths researchers attribute to another exceptional heat wave that swept Europe in 2003. That disaster helped raise awareness about the dangers of climate change and the continent’s general lack of heat action plans.

Yet the new findings suggest that in the two decades since, efforts to prepare for a hotter future and protect the continent’s most vulnerable populations have fallen short.

...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] argv_minus_one 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Tens of thousands of people died during intense heat waves in Europe last summer, indicating that heat prevention plans aren’t protecting vulnerable populations

I can't help wondering if that's intentional. Vulnerable populations tend to consist of people that the rich consider undesirable…

[–] alyaza 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I can’t help wondering if that’s intentional.

i don't think so, no. the reason i think that is the people who study this stuff for a living are being taken aback at how quickly things are changing--and if they're surprised, it's inevitable breakdowns like this will happen because everyone else is moving slower than them.

just in general, most places are woefully underprepared for a changing climate, and a lot of it is not caused by malice somewhere in the chain. it's largely a combination of conservatism (both political and climatological), lack of political will, lack of resources, and just how quickly things are changing.

[–] reric88 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's an unpopular opinion, but I wish the world would share with the world. It's a lot to ask I guess, but man, imagine how quickly we could progress as a species if everyone in the world truly had the same chance at life.

I'd pay for my neighbors bills if I knew I'd have my bills paid for when I absolutely needed it.

[–] RickRussell_CA 2 points 2 years ago

But that's sOCialIsM! -- Your conservative neighbors, probably.

[–] RickRussell_CA 1 points 2 years ago

I think it's "intentional" in the sense that rich people knew this was coming, they tell pleasing lies and publicly deny it, and they believe themselves to be insulated from the effects by their wealth and resources.

And I guess they're right about that.